Are you willing to tell me how a complicated programme like DNA could write itself? Or a protein producing engine like a cell could design itself? Come on, these are the questions for you guys. But you can’t go beyond putting silly cartoon figures up as though it actually challenged anything. Get to the real issues man! But you never tackle them. Proves something? 😃😃😃
@Speedyman I have told you this several times. Cells and DNA and all such complexities developed from less complex complexities, and they in turn from even less complex complexities. If you cannot grasp the simplicity and inevitability of such a basic concept, then you will be unable to grasp anything of worth.
Or do you still hold to the laughable creationist claim that cells and DNA (and everything else) just sort of poofed into existence?
DNA isn't complicated... and it also isn’t a programme. It’s a huge molecule, quite fragile, and it carries a hefty punch, but it isn’t complicated. Nevertheless, as so often is the case with elegant simplicity, its effects are absolutely beautiful.
@Speedyman Umm... what’s the difference between living and non-living matter? because before you say one cannot lead to the other, you you’ll need to have them clearly defined.
After all, the process works in one direction, so why can’t it work in the other direction?
I mean, what’s the big deal with turning water into wine?
We are made up of non-living matter. Nothing lives except when it is put together. No-one knows why. Yet we have your weird explanations that non-living put itself together. Hi.arioys! Theatre of the Absurd! @newjaninev2
DNA isn’t complicated? Bill Gates has said one of his programmers couldn’t have designed anything like it. Dear oh dear. Come into the world of reality @newjaninev2
@Speedyman That entire comment is a celebration of your self-confessed ignorance and bewilderment.
Worse, it is incoherent. We are made up of non-living matter, but then apparently it lives when it is ‘put together’. Do you think that we’re some sort of Frankenstein’s monster-style Lego sets?
If you have nothing coherent to say, please do not therefore feel compelled to say something regardless.
@Speedyman "Just in terms of allocation of time resources, religion is not very efficient. There's a lot more I could be doing on a Sunday morning." Time, January 13, 1997.
Seems he wasn't keen on religious observance, either.
Are you willing to tell me how a complicated programme like DNA could write itself?
Are you willing to tell us how an even more complex thing like this "god" is supposed to be could create itself and why the same explanation could not apply to a simple cell?
I am talking about the impossibility of cells programming themselves. Like Hamlet writing itself. I believe atheists believe it’s possible! 🤣@Bushranger
@Speedyman What? Do you think that cells are little computers? DNA is not a computer program. It does not require a programmer to put it together, it evolved over billions of years.
