I am not religious I just hold the Bible true [Spirituality & Religion]
many people here are mistaken
i love the spirit only😘
i love the spirit only😘
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Hey bud. You kinda dropped out of our conversation about evolution.
You agreed to demonstrate how creation better explained the evidence but when i actually presented you with the evidence, you disappeared.
Care to take that up again?🙂
You agreed to demonstrate how creation better explained the evidence but when i actually presented you with the evidence, you disappeared.
Care to take that up again?🙂
Sarabee · 41-45
@Pikachu adam n eve were the first to be created 7,000 years ago everything was created 7,000 years ago was adam a baby when created no he was fully mature was anything little at creation no they were all mature so what makes you think im going to say yeah you're right
yes we are evolving but only within everythings own race and that one human skull they found that sort of represents an ape leave the retarded alone
yes we are evolving but only within everythings own race and that one human skull they found that sort of represents an ape leave the retarded alone
@Sarabee
Actually the evidence i shared with you showed an inherited link between humans and other great apes.
Would you like me to repost it here so that you can fully address how creation better explains the evidence?
You did agree to those terms, remember?
Are you going to make good on your word?🤔
Actually the evidence i shared with you showed an inherited link between humans and other great apes.
Would you like me to repost it here so that you can fully address how creation better explains the evidence?
You did agree to those terms, remember?
Are you going to make good on your word?🤔
@Sarabee
If you want to have the intellectual discussion regarding evolution which you agreed to have with me then let's do it. Please don't make excuses and loopholes so in order to permit yourself NOT to respond to what i say.
Again, here is evidence which indicates a shared heritage between human beings and other great apes. You agree that you would demonstrate how creation BETTER explained this evidence than evolution.
Endogenous retro viruses. Let's begin. I trust a short paragraph won't be considered so long-winded that you can ignore it.
Retroviruses are viruses that reproduce by inserting their genetic information into host cells which then replicate.
When these viruses infect reproductive cells, their genetic information is passed on to the progeny of the host. This results in the presence of retroviral rna in our human genetic code. Junk dna from a foreign organism.
The interesting thing is that we’ve been able to map the genome of other animals. For instance, the chimpanzee. When we look at the chimp’s dna we find, to an astonishing degree, the same retroviral genetics in the same places that we find them in human dna.
So why is there useless, inactive junk genetic information in our genome that corresponds so well to that of chimps? Evolution tells us that it is because of common decent. That humans and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor that also had that retroviral rna in those places.
If you espouse a creation model, you must then explain why a creator might include useless, garbage genetic information in the same places in different species.
If you want to have the intellectual discussion regarding evolution which you agreed to have with me then let's do it. Please don't make excuses and loopholes so in order to permit yourself NOT to respond to what i say.
Again, here is evidence which indicates a shared heritage between human beings and other great apes. You agree that you would demonstrate how creation BETTER explained this evidence than evolution.
Endogenous retro viruses. Let's begin. I trust a short paragraph won't be considered so long-winded that you can ignore it.
Retroviruses are viruses that reproduce by inserting their genetic information into host cells which then replicate.
When these viruses infect reproductive cells, their genetic information is passed on to the progeny of the host. This results in the presence of retroviral rna in our human genetic code. Junk dna from a foreign organism.
The interesting thing is that we’ve been able to map the genome of other animals. For instance, the chimpanzee. When we look at the chimp’s dna we find, to an astonishing degree, the same retroviral genetics in the same places that we find them in human dna.
So why is there useless, inactive junk genetic information in our genome that corresponds so well to that of chimps? Evolution tells us that it is because of common decent. That humans and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor that also had that retroviral rna in those places.
If you espouse a creation model, you must then explain why a creator might include useless, garbage genetic information in the same places in different species.
@Sarabee
I didn't ask you to accept evolution. I asked you to make good on your word.
You agreed that you'd provide a superior creation-based explanation for the evidence.
Evidently that was a bit of a boast.
That's fine. But maybe next time you say that evolution has holes or doesn't explain what we see in the natural world, you should remember this.
Glass houses and all that😉
I didn't ask you to accept evolution. I asked you to make good on your word.
You agreed that you'd provide a superior creation-based explanation for the evidence.
Evidently that was a bit of a boast.
That's fine. But maybe next time you say that evolution has holes or doesn't explain what we see in the natural world, you should remember this.
Glass houses and all that😉