I am not religious I just hold the Bible true [Spirituality & Religion]
many people here are mistaken
i love the spirit only😘
i love the spirit only😘
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Doomflower · 41-45, M
Much of the historical claims in the bible are distinctly lacking evidence or have proven to be false. Then there are things like how it says in Ezekiel that the city of Tyre would never be rebuilt. Jesus said some of his apostles at the time he was alive would not die before be returned again. Then there is the endorsement of slavery and failure to condemn rape.
Sarabee · 41-45
@Doomflower i have no idea what bible youre reading but all of my bible has come to pass KJV
Hey bud. You kinda dropped out of our conversation about evolution.
You agreed to demonstrate how creation better explained the evidence but when i actually presented you with the evidence, you disappeared.
Care to take that up again?🙂
You agreed to demonstrate how creation better explained the evidence but when i actually presented you with the evidence, you disappeared.
Care to take that up again?🙂
View 3 more replies »
@Sarabee
If you want to have the intellectual discussion regarding evolution which you agreed to have with me then let's do it. Please don't make excuses and loopholes so in order to permit yourself NOT to respond to what i say.
Again, here is evidence which indicates a shared heritage between human beings and other great apes. You agree that you would demonstrate how creation BETTER explained this evidence than evolution.
Endogenous retro viruses. Let's begin. I trust a short paragraph won't be considered so long-winded that you can ignore it.
Retroviruses are viruses that reproduce by inserting their genetic information into host cells which then replicate.
When these viruses infect reproductive cells, their genetic information is passed on to the progeny of the host. This results in the presence of retroviral rna in our human genetic code. Junk dna from a foreign organism.
The interesting thing is that we’ve been able to map the genome of other animals. For instance, the chimpanzee. When we look at the chimp’s dna we find, to an astonishing degree, the same retroviral genetics in the same places that we find them in human dna.
So why is there useless, inactive junk genetic information in our genome that corresponds so well to that of chimps? Evolution tells us that it is because of common decent. That humans and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor that also had that retroviral rna in those places.
If you espouse a creation model, you must then explain why a creator might include useless, garbage genetic information in the same places in different species.
If you want to have the intellectual discussion regarding evolution which you agreed to have with me then let's do it. Please don't make excuses and loopholes so in order to permit yourself NOT to respond to what i say.
Again, here is evidence which indicates a shared heritage between human beings and other great apes. You agree that you would demonstrate how creation BETTER explained this evidence than evolution.
Endogenous retro viruses. Let's begin. I trust a short paragraph won't be considered so long-winded that you can ignore it.
Retroviruses are viruses that reproduce by inserting their genetic information into host cells which then replicate.
When these viruses infect reproductive cells, their genetic information is passed on to the progeny of the host. This results in the presence of retroviral rna in our human genetic code. Junk dna from a foreign organism.
The interesting thing is that we’ve been able to map the genome of other animals. For instance, the chimpanzee. When we look at the chimp’s dna we find, to an astonishing degree, the same retroviral genetics in the same places that we find them in human dna.
So why is there useless, inactive junk genetic information in our genome that corresponds so well to that of chimps? Evolution tells us that it is because of common decent. That humans and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor that also had that retroviral rna in those places.
If you espouse a creation model, you must then explain why a creator might include useless, garbage genetic information in the same places in different species.
@Sarabee
I didn't ask you to accept evolution. I asked you to make good on your word.
You agreed that you'd provide a superior creation-based explanation for the evidence.
Evidently that was a bit of a boast.
That's fine. But maybe next time you say that evolution has holes or doesn't explain what we see in the natural world, you should remember this.
Glass houses and all that😉
I didn't ask you to accept evolution. I asked you to make good on your word.
You agreed that you'd provide a superior creation-based explanation for the evidence.
Evidently that was a bit of a boast.
That's fine. But maybe next time you say that evolution has holes or doesn't explain what we see in the natural world, you should remember this.
Glass houses and all that😉
Sarabee · 41-45
@SW-User what evers the best
we all have different taste buds we all make different decisions we all love something
we all have different taste buds we all make different decisions we all love something
SW-User
@Sarabee we do and not all of us have the same opinions
Sarabee · 41-45
@SW-User we do not some of us have no opinion🤔
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Amen to that!!
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment