This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@HoraceGreenley
...yes, that's the fallacious description to which i am referring.
thank you for the visual example...
...yes, that's the fallacious description to which i am referring.
thank you for the visual example...
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
@HoraceGreenley
*sigh*
Sorry kid, i don't speak meme and i don't want them cluttering up my thread.
You're welcome to use your words if you so choose.
*sigh*
Sorry kid, i don't speak meme and i don't want them cluttering up my thread.
You're welcome to use your words if you so choose.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Pikachu You liked my first meme, so you let it remain. You didn't like the second one so you deleted it.
Be honest.
Be honest.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@HoraceGreenley Still makes more sense than Sky Daddy clapping his hands and then spazzing about what kind of fabric people wear 🤷♂️
But really atheism doesn't require any of that stuff. People were atheists before there was a theory of big bang or evolution. It's ok not to know how things came about, the point is not inventing fanciful explanations with no grounding.
But really atheism doesn't require any of that stuff. People were atheists before there was a theory of big bang or evolution. It's ok not to know how things came about, the point is not inventing fanciful explanations with no grounding.
@HoraceGreenley
In fact i [i]didn't[/i] like your first meme, i was just giving you a free pass on your first post since i know you find it very difficult to articulate and idea which has not been presented to you in the form of a picture with a snarky caption.
All clear?
In fact i [i]didn't[/i] like your first meme, i was just giving you a free pass on your first post since i know you find it very difficult to articulate and idea which has not been presented to you in the form of a picture with a snarky caption.
All clear?