No one should be killed for opinions.

When did violence, cowardice, and murder become celebrated?
The act of celebrating someone's death is the most disgusting and clearly evil thing one could do.

This is what fascism looks like, eliminating opponents who don't agree with them.
Violence is the tool of those who have no argument.
This is the nature of communists.
This is the true essence, the true heart of the left.

The lack of empathy from this generation is scary.
Social media has revealed how inner demonic possession is deeper than we think.

[media=https://youtu.be/Y3UYureSXak]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

WestonT · 18-21, M

I'm just amused by all the moral grandstanding from people who are viciously condemning the people they hate.

No one should be killed for their opinions--yes.
Celebrating someone's death is tasteless and in bad form and potentially evil. It is not the worst thing someone can do. I think causing those deaths is worse, but often that gets a pass.

The rest is just nonsense.

HoeBag · 46-50, F

@WestonT People have been k*lled for way less than whatever Kirk was for (still unknown yet).

Thing is, Kirk ran his mouth quite a bit and people can say "Freedom of speech" but words can have consequences.

Celebrating someone's death is tasteless and in bad form and potentially evil.

Possibly, but when it is someone that is h4ted by many, there is a sense of relief.
Kirk was a huge 2nd amendment advocate, supposedly even talking about how school shootings were just an unfortunate price to pay for the right to bear arms.

Translation - he was basically saying it is worth it for schools to be shot so we could keep our gun rights.