With each secret of the cosmos I unlock I feel wowed that I did it. My latest is proving a specific pattern for the destruction and creation of events. This is it:
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@SomeMichGuy It means that a theory for the natural provision of afterlife has a creation efficiency level equaling that for non-provision. Congruence is established, thus plausibility.
Anna, by "congruence", do you mean "equality" in the normal numerical sense? Are you arguing that you are showing that the probabilities of "afterlife" v. "no afterlife" are equal?
If so, why would existence of X v. non-existence of X depend upon the probabilities of these two outcomes being equal?
