People & Family

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

AMNESIA: the 2023 Pandemic of the Ruling Class

Everyone involved – both major political parties, deep state, media, tech, and pharma – wants everyone to forget about lockdowns, school closures, travel restrictions, church shutdowns, missed cancer screenings, wrecked small businesses, rent moratoriums, brutalized elderly, canceled weddings, zoom funerals, ventilator deaths, censorship and firings, masking children, rushed vaccines and injury/death, segregation by shot compliance, ruined household finances, substance abuse and suicide, lowered life expectancy, and the mass violation of the Bill of Rights.

All of this has become a great taboo, even though it wrecked the country and the world, and the damage is all around us. If enough people participate in a crime, it is made to disappear by all the commanding heights.

This way they never have to admit or apologize, and can do it all over again when the time comes.

The people have been prepped by their leaders to obey blindly. To accept the outrageous curtailment of their rights. They are ready to do anything if it will keep them "safe." It will be so easy to turn the screw on them next time.

[i]Source (for all those who refuse to consider anything unless they have "the source"): observation, reasoning, and common sense[/i]

This post is closed and no longer available for commenting.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

Nice, but you ignore the lives probably saved, the best recovery in history, the strongest economy. Good try to divert from the existential problems occuring worldwide.

1-25 of 52

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!! Oh Thank you for the belly laugh!!!!! I needed that. Aunts and uncles are being displaced due to forest fires and you come up with that line. What a stress relief!!! Thank you again. I am going to have to remember that joke. It is a real winner!

WalterF · 70-79, M

@samueltyler2 The collateral damage, described above, is so immense that it entirely obliterates any tiny advantage you may try to find. Remember the first rule of the medical profession: "do no harm?" They have done untold harm. Untold destruction and ruination.

And you think that's a good result? Despicable,

Fairydust · F

@samueltyler2
Strongest economy? Are you kidding me!!!

All the problems happening in the world are caused by them running the world.

🙄 [image deleted]

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@Fairydust you really need to study the facts, not regurgitate nonsense from the ultra right.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@WalterF you are speaking like the idiot right wing nuts who have no idea of the facts.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 Facts like yours killed a lot of people. Try to refute anything I said with actual science/evidence.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 you won't read any of the peer reviewed articles I would send you, you refused in the past. What really amazes me is that you characters stopped writing the COVID nonsense until now, when you are also the supporters of the nut cases in the lunatic right wing conspiracy crowd who now are trying to divert attention from that nonsense.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 Peer review isn't science. It is academe. Care to supply any actual refutain knowing full well that the peer review is fake.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 you are amazingly obstinate, and in such denial. Peer review Trump's all anecdotal stories. How can anyone refute that? Be serious, try a better approach!

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 Have seen how many 'peer reviewed' studies have been withdrawn because they were faked? You do need to get out more.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 you are out of your mind! Truly nuts, how many such alleged faked peer reviewed articles do you know about? List them!

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 Do a little investigating. Everything I said about peer review is true. https://www.science.org/content/article/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 I'd suggest you read the article you post. The number of retracted articles, the reason behind them. The fact that publishers do retract and article if it is found to be inaccurate, should actually strengthen your believe in the process, not do the opposite. Science is self correcting.
https://www.enago.com/academy/database-of-retracted-papers-launched-for-researchers/

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 That certainly isn't the only article I have read saying exactly the same thing. I watched an interview with a man who made a living publishing fake papers. He learned the lingo used and would get paper after paper after paper published and even cited by other papers. He is a brilliant man but he had no training in the area he was writing papers on. As my old professor once warned us. "NO study ever proves". "At best it may indicate". He was a former engineer that worked on the design of the Saturn Rocket. Pretty smart fellow. I have two cousins in law. One has a doctorate in engineering and the other is a highschool teacher. The highschool teacher believes every study published because in his world facts are found in text books. The engineer who became the head of a major fuel cell design company doesn't believe any of the studies since the simply "seem to indicate". I agree with my engineering cousin not my highschool teacher cousin.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 again you cite anecdotes, not accepted data. Scientific investigations always rise to the 95% confidence level. With duplication of results, such science becomes accepted. There is real danger in not accepting published science as proven "facts." I would not want that personal n designing anything I would use.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 You do know that all your 'studies' are based on anecdotal evidence. If I know 5 people that died because of the vax then that extrapolates into a huge number vax deaths among the general population. Evidence deniers like you refuse to see the evidence despite its prevalence.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 I am afraid to ask, because I don't want to encourage your nonsense, how do you happen to KNOW they died as a result of the vaccine. I suppose you have an advanced intellectual capacity and can tell just by thinking about it. What is the reported evidence, i know the CDC and VAERS do have some case reports, that is raw data, that is then evaluated case by case. The actual incidence of deaths that might have been related is very, very small, compared to the number of reported deaths from COVID and the lives saved by the vaccine, and proven therapy. But, I know you will disagree, because that is what you do.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 unknown conditions happening to healthy people in very close proximity to the time of the jab. A healthy man gets jabbed so he can work in an old folks home. He had annual checkups so there is a medical history to go on. He got jabbed at 4 pm. He had no ill effects from the vax. He went to bed at his usual hour 10 PM. He never woke up. His wife woke up with a cooling body beside her next morning. His heart had stopped suddenly. According to his widow, a friend of mine, the doctor determined it was the vax that killed him. My brother in law wanted to go RVing. Healthy man no known medical conditions. He got jabbed and that night was rushed to the hospital gasping for breath. A few days later he died from massive blood clots in his lungs. The doctor determined it was caused by the vax. I could go on with all 5 of them but this isn't a scientific paper.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 total nonsense. Have you looked at the reports of excessive unexplained deaths during the covid outbreak? If you look at the geography there were far more such deaths in non-vaccinated areas then in vaccinated ones.

How did the so called greating physician make the connection? Was an autopsy done, what was the proximate cause of death. A temporal association does not prove causation.

I really find your responses tedious, you only believe what you predetermined to believe, so it isn't worth trying to correct you.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 You are going to have to argue with the two doctors not me. I know they died and died suddenly in close proximity to receiving the jab. Science tells us that the two events are most likely related.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 no it does not, you don't know what you are talking about, that is not how science works.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 Bradford Hill criteria disagrees with you. I guess you are not as scientifically aware as you think you are.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@hippyjoe1955 you misquote again.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@samueltyler2 So you have no idea what I am talking about. Why does that surprise me. 🙄

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

1-25 of 52

This post is closed and no longer available for commenting.