Shadow Banning vs Visibility Filter...same thing, right? Shifting your language and your definitions of things doesn't mean you aren't lying.

Or, as I wanted to say, lying your ba🏒🏒s off.

Conservatives were shadow banned on Twitter, or...in Twitter speak..."visibility filtered".

Doctors who posted their concerns about Covid vaccines in children were blacklisted from being able to spread their message. Lockdown ensued which harmed children. A LOT of children.

Why were Twitter executives holding secret councils of 4 of the most powerful among them, to decide WHICH Covid information could get out to the public, essentially politicizing a medical issue?

Why were certain politicians shadow banned so that the money they spent on ads in their campaigns never saw 90 per cent of the public?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

carpediem · 61-69, M

At least there seems to be some movement to bringing these issues out. Not that anything will happen with the corrupt bunch of a-holes we currently have in office. But imagine how deep this goes with say.... Google. Tell me they don't alter search results to the detriment of people with ideas they don't like. And Facebook is right there as well. The rest of them fall right in line.

The left likes to win. Lying, cheating and censorship are all acceptable because they're a means to an end. Nothing will happen because those in power agree they produce results. Oh... what about our freedoms you say? It looks like they've found a work-around to the Constitution.

revenant · F

@carpediem yep...all means are good. Integrity is a dirty word.

4meAndyou · F

@carpediem I was watching the Five tonight, and Dagen McDowell said she called someone or other, and asked him what he thought about the Twitter scandals...and he asked, "Why are you bothering with little Twitter?" He said you should do a really deep dive into the Five Horses of the Apocalypse...Facebook, Google, Amazon...and I forget who else.