I have been blocked by a skeletal user who posted a thinly veiled portrayal...
...of child pornography.
The user posted this:
No, I will not share the uncensored version.
In the furry fandom, this sort of "artwork" is referred to as cub pornography, and artists who produce it are shamed into retiring. The only persons who enjoy such artwork are suffering from a particular mental disorder.
Update: Clearly, I am in the wrong for taking offense at such content being shared. I shall leave you all to enjoy it.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
She's not a pedo. I think she shared that just because she thought it was fucked up. I used to be friends with her, but she randomly got upset with me over a misunderstanding and blocked me everywhere. Oh well.
Regardless, she's definitely not a pedophile to my knowledge.
@basilfawlty89 She reacted by taking personal offense at the idea that anyone could interpret that post in such fashion, to the point where she is blocking anyone who suggests nefarious motives. Perhaps that is because of her extreme revulsion to the image in question, and I am certainly willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. However, she called Shadowfire "deranged" and a "soyboy".
