I wonder how many ..
Tik tok users realise you gave it permission to read your messages,.. Plus other things?🤔
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Richard65 · M
In books like 1984, we were warned of a dystopian, authoritarian future where society is monitored constantly by a terrifying government and everyone has their personal information harvested and filed against their collective will. Instead, in the 21st century, we happily hand over all our personal information for free simply in exchange for funny cat videos.
SuziSatan02 · 46-50, F
@Richard65 People don't "happily" hand it over - people do it because they're weaklings, they believe they have no choice, they're in denial of the fact that the way the world works is this - te human species, comprised of autonomous indivduals, communally owns every other life form, and each one of the autonomous individual humans may command (or, if they see fit, kill) the human-shaped beings who become members of a collective (e.g a "business", or a branch of "the State"). Because by joining or forming a collective (to claim entitlement to power and wealth) those "people" have placed themselves outside the human race (if they were ever in it).
Humans do not govern, humans do not claim ownership of land or buildings other than their own houses, and humans do not practice business (instead they "perform services", as part of the social contract they have to uphold to deter their peers from killing them). So, therefore...
Neither TikTok, nor Similar Worlds, nor any named collective of thieving abusers, are entitled to refuse service to a human nor to make any demands of service-users (least of all knowledge of their identities). We humans as individuals who own ourselves, and as their victims/superiors we own them, therefore we set their terms and conditions (not vice versa), we individually decide whether they live or die. Because they have committed the crime (against nature) of taking on a collective identity (and also the crime of pretending to own things that don't actually exist, e.g "intellectual property"), and in this way they have become nothing, asocial, sub-human, sub-microbial, shit-on-legs.
Humans do not govern, humans do not claim ownership of land or buildings other than their own houses, and humans do not practice business (instead they "perform services", as part of the social contract they have to uphold to deter their peers from killing them). So, therefore...
Neither TikTok, nor Similar Worlds, nor any named collective of thieving abusers, are entitled to refuse service to a human nor to make any demands of service-users (least of all knowledge of their identities). We humans as individuals who own ourselves, and as their victims/superiors we own them, therefore we set their terms and conditions (not vice versa), we individually decide whether they live or die. Because they have committed the crime (against nature) of taking on a collective identity (and also the crime of pretending to own things that don't actually exist, e.g "intellectual property"), and in this way they have become nothing, asocial, sub-human, sub-microbial, shit-on-legs.
Richard65 · M
@SuziSatan02 you sound like a riot.
SuziSatan02 · 46-50, F
@Richard65 For riot read revolution (and not 360 degrees)
This message was deleted by its author.