Sure. Why not? It is just a scent. It does not change the sexual or gender orientation of anyone. Up until approx 110 years ago we all wore the same scent anyways. Coco Chanel changed that.

I'll use Calvin Klien One as an example-say that was around at the turn of the previous century. (it was not) No we have Calvin Klien One for Him---and for Her. Pre 1910 we had Calvin Klein One and both sexes wore it.

Women wore boxers for many years. We each wore the same underpants in essence as BVD was not around. (Neither were bras around so she wore corsets and girdles. )

In the mid 1920 a move was made to take the boxers and redesign it to be more feminine. And thus the panty was made. Women of the day WOULD NOT WEAR them. They were 6 for ONE DOLLAR! At all. At least in the US. No self respecting woman anyway. They were for whores, houses of ill repute, ladies of the night and such. Opinions began to change after post war France issued in the Bikini- (but European woman never had the same opinion as American woman of bloomers)

It is just clothing, or a perfume- it does not define the person.

There are still two large bottles of undelivered perfume ordered by Napoleon Bonaparte in his signature to a perfume house in France. Undelivered and in a case as Napoleon died at Waterloo before the order was processed.

To him , even in defeat, the smell of battle was sweet.

Do u have any sad feelings when u think of him? If so then probably best not to buy it

That's a terrible idea. I would think anyone who wears the same thing is doomed as well.

I don't think that's a good idea.

yes sure go for it

Lmao can relate

Be like Nike, Just Do It.

Get it!!!!😀

And what scent was that he wore?

yes