Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Did Hillary "win" just because she didn't dissolve in a puddle of tears before the Benghazi committee?

She didn't have good answers for all the questions. She was exposed as a liar because newly revealed emails show she knew right away the Benghazi incident was a terrorist attack, not a "protest" over a video, prior to her telling the survivors' family members it was all about the video. Her passing the buck about not heeding Ambassador Stevens' pleas for more security was unpersuasive.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

Laura36

That was the Smoking Gun after Benghazi 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 ? Why didn't they drag her away in chains kicking and screaming over such a "Heinous" crime ! The told the world it was a political smear job and then failed miserably to hit the target when the heat was on !

imgreywlf

She did not commit any crime. Hillery tried to get things done according to the rules. She requested more funding but did not get it. If she had done a shortcut she would have been roasted over the fire for that too and violating the law that would have sent her to jail!

praisebetotheallfather

She won because Republicans spent millions of tax payer money on a witch hunt to hurt her political chances without uncovering the actual security issues that led to the attack on the US Consulate in Libya.

imgreywlf

You mean How The State Department needed more funds and they were denied.

senorslurp

if you're a clinton you can get away with anything.

imgreywlf

Yes as long as you follow the law. It is to bad Republicans try so hard to get intelligent people to believe them when they tell lies. In the 21 Sept 2015 issue of Time there is an interesting article about David Brock Who once was a top republican in charge of deception for the Republicans tells how the Republicans try to smear the Democratic party Leaders (Most recently Hillery before he departed the Republicans.) I think you would learn something about believing the Part line that being not to.

senorslurp

and the left is completely innocent of no lies, deceipt, and corruption, you would have me believe? The left survives on smear campaigns. Bitch stop wake up.

imgreywlf

senorslurp who are you talking to?
And is calling anyone a bitch really showing anyone that your intelligent? It degrades you and cost you credibility. The article goes into how the Republican Party lies, distores and smears things.

newstu

getting the truth from a Clinton is as futile as herding cats

imgreywlf

Getting a republican to accept the truth is like catching water in a strainer.

Meowsolini

Why are are you just NOW bringing this up?

imgreywlf

Because he is a cool-aid drinking republican.
He believes everything the Republican party puts forward. He does not understand that no one wins when MILLIONS of dollars are wasted on an attempt to find wrong doing with the State Department when they did nothing wrong. No one wins as long as Congress gets away with wasting money trying to make the State Department responsible when it was Congress who refuse to allow the additional funds needed to provide the Security/Protection that is required at such installations. She would have won if when she request the additional funding she needed when it was requested.
At the present time it is not about winning those who understand the woman knows it is about shinning light on the lies, told about her. Only then when all are aware of what an outstanding woman she is, will she win.

Add a comment...