Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Did Hillary "win" just because she didn't dissolve in a puddle of tears before the Benghazi committee?

She didn't have good answers for all the questions. She was exposed as a liar because newly revealed emails show she knew right away the Benghazi incident was a terrorist attack, not a "protest" over a video, prior to her telling the survivors' family members it was all about the video. Her passing the buck about not heeding Ambassador Stevens' pleas for more security was unpersuasive.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

senorslurp

if you're a clinton you can get away with anything.

imgreywlf

Yes as long as you follow the law. It is to bad Republicans try so hard to get intelligent people to believe them when they tell lies. In the 21 Sept 2015 issue of Time there is an interesting article about David Brock Who once was a top republican in charge of deception for the Republicans tells how the Republicans try to smear the Democratic party Leaders (Most recently Hillery before he departed the Republicans.) I think you would learn something about believing the Part line that being not to.

senorslurp

and the left is completely innocent of no lies, deceipt, and corruption, you would have me believe? The left survives on smear campaigns. Bitch stop wake up.

imgreywlf

senorslurp who are you talking to?
And is calling anyone a bitch really showing anyone that your intelligent? It degrades you and cost you credibility. The article goes into how the Republican Party lies, distores and smears things.