Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Did Hillary "win" just because she didn't dissolve in a puddle of tears before the Benghazi committee?

She didn't have good answers for all the questions. She was exposed as a liar because newly revealed emails show she knew right away the Benghazi incident was a terrorist attack, not a "protest" over a video, prior to her telling the survivors' family members it was all about the video. Her passing the buck about not heeding Ambassador Stevens' pleas for more security was unpersuasive.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Meowsolini

Why are are you just NOW bringing this up?

imgreywlf

Because he is a cool-aid drinking republican.
He believes everything the Republican party puts forward. He does not understand that no one wins when MILLIONS of dollars are wasted on an attempt to find wrong doing with the State Department when they did nothing wrong. No one wins as long as Congress gets away with wasting money trying to make the State Department responsible when it was Congress who refuse to allow the additional funds needed to provide the Security/Protection that is required at such installations. She would have won if when she request the additional funding she needed when it was requested.
At the present time it is not about winning those who understand the woman knows it is about shinning light on the lies, told about her. Only then when all are aware of what an outstanding woman she is, will she win.