Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Isn't it time for "Female Husbands & Male Wives" ? women have advanced themselves in all ways.. so why not?

SW-User
This is really not to my liking... to put it nicely.
I have spent most of my life raising my children and working.
There's a lot of lazy men out there and I don't need a name change to do what needs to be done.
AND... lumping all women into one way... shows you haven't realized all women are not the same and don't want the same things.

I'm going to take a nap and pretend this site doesn't exist.
SW-User
@in10RjFox A male nurse is still a nurse... A doctor is still a doctor, female or male. We don't need to reassign role names.
Choices have always been available. There are stay at home dads and mothers who work... still mom and dad either way..

A written mutual understanding... still doesn't save every marriage...kind of like prenuptials... nothing is guaranteed to save a marriage.
As far as I know, a lot depends on who can accomplish what in a relationship.
I don't wish to support any more men. Been there and done that.
in10RjFox · M
@SW-User
[quote].
I don't wish to support any more men. Been there and done that.[/quote]

I really don't get you here. You have misunderstood something which I am unable to figure out.

Where did the question of supporting men arise ?
The idea of the post in itself is women liberation and not even equality as women can also be superior and not be a servant / subservient to men.
in10RjFox · M
@SW-User why can't single female be both mother and father of a child, rather than classifying as Fatherless child ?

[b]How will it be[/b] if a female doctor is called a nurse, because traditionally females were never considered a doctor, but a male nurse is called a Doctor.. since men are superior.

I am saying that's how the terms husband and wife are ..
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
in10RjFox · M
@OldMan70 written all as books and have turned an author and publisher and have recently created an online course.

But still hibernating due to lack of company and support.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
in10RjFox · M
@OldMan70 I did. But just could not maintain subscription. So waiting for some investment so I can combine with some activity.

It would be great if you can start a support group from wherever you are and bring women forward. Things can change only if women start taking control of life.

Check this online course and the Avatar I have launched.

https://bit.ly/NewEraBegins
If you mean men and women taking on roles traditionally filled by the other gender, that's been going on for a long time. There are already families where the woman works and the man stays home and takes care of the kids.
in10RjFox · M
@LeopoldBloom 😀😀😀😀 Future has already discounted you. FRS is for future generation, not old nuts that are living dead.
in10RjFox · M
@LeopoldBloom Future is headed to transform as Union of Families and no longer union of people. And any system gets developed as universal . One and for all. So it cannot be specifically developed to exclude morons.

Like the days of advent of mobile phones, some morons did resist. But eventually they had to confer.

FRS shall takeover issuance of birth certificates, passport, social security etc. Even Visas will require approval by local FRS.
@in10RjFox The nuclear family is a recent invention and is already on the way out. "Family based" society has been proposed for the US by hacks like David Barton as a cover for only allowing male heads of households to vote. The situation may be different in India, but here we're dealing with white nationalists who are seeing their power slip away as they become a minority.
helenS · 36-40, F
SW went online in 2016, and this post is from 2012. I don't get that. 😐
I think there are more than only a few feminized husbands; I've talke to some, on SW.
Basia · 41-45, F
We have advanced but we are not insane.
sanderlay
For those who would like this life style I'm fine with it, but not imposed on all. Conversely... a male husband and a female wife should not be imposed on all either. My issue is a husband or a wife being dominate over the other.

What about a partnership where both partners are equal. They discuss with each other and come to agreement. They use their talents and work together for their common goals. They love and support each other in good times and bad because they are your best friend. Love, not dominance, is the glue that binds them together.

My point is that women should be seen as equals to their male counterparts. Femininity or masculinity should not be seen as a weakness but a strength in either partner. So do we even need the titles of husband and wife?
in10RjFox · M
Lovely. This is the kinda response I expected. Probably you may also agree that only when a change is proposed we question the root and ask how did it come up in the first place ?

Also the reason many think of doing away with the marriage system itself that creates such a relationship.
sanderlay
I agree that we should always question, any institution, label or tradition, and renew as needed for the changing times. I want to know why I should before I do or follow any institution or tradition. I will not follow someone or something blindly.

I see marriage as love between two people, a deep friendship, a life time commitment, who wish to live their lives together. That commitment, in creation, should remain flexible between them for their own beliefs. It should also be reviewed and updated regularly to renew their commitment, love, to each other. So marriage to me has much value and takes commitment and love to a whole other level.

I will add that gender should not label someone to certain labels or stereo-types. It's our talents and who we wish to present as that should be rewarded and encouraged.
gairenome
as much as possible it should be an equally shared experience/responsibility
gairenome
evolution is all about the survival of the fittest. There was a time in our evolution where it made sense for our survival to have man the hunter and woman at home looking after the domestic duties. But i think we have evolved way beyond that and now it is a question of a good, happy, succesful marrage. To impose old fashioned social norms in this day and age is a recipe for a disastrious marrage....
gairenome
but i defy a man to have the same maternal instincts as a woman...:)
in10RjFox · M
That's just branding using old scriptures. Its basically the opportunity. I got the opportunity to raise my twin sons and I got all the maternal instincts. Its like saying only men can gain driving skills, by never letting women try it.
JoeDiablo
I think they call it stay at home dads, and working mums.
in10RjFox · M
After a child is born... why not call em male mom & female dad, since there is a role reversal ?
JoeDiablo
Mom and Dad are specific to gender not to the roles played. It would be like calling a man she, or a woman he. Just doesn't work. Even in gay families, the parents are reffered to as "My two Dads"
in10RjFox · M
Do we really need these words then? Instead of finding newer terms , aren't we spoiling or misusing the older ones? Just letting everything go wrong. Isn't mom n dad role specific in a family, like director n CEO in a company?
hellsbellsxxx
I really don't understand that question, swapping the titles around wouldn't change anything xx
in10RjFox · M
is it? then why not change the title? people should accept it freely isn't it?
PinksWoman
god yes, with all that entails. some men, like me, are submissive and willing to cede authority to their SO. In the home and in the bedroom. Personally I'd even like to dress appropriately
in10RjFox · M
Lied down on an A3 Scanner.. and scanned myself in color.

 
Post Comment