Top | Newest First | Oldest First
SW-User
It can鈥檛 be older than 6000 years. Impossibl茅
@SW-User
lol according to some folks anyway....
lol according to some folks anyway....
Carazaa 路 F
This proves the Bible correct that Birds and bats and creatures that fly came before any other life.
View 11 more replies 禄
@Carazaa
[quote]I gave you about 20 articles 2 month ago![/quote]
Sorry, no memory of that. 20 seems like a lot so i doubt it.
I know what you have done in the past is link me to AiG.
I know that those articles don't dispute the fossil record as it stands the way you do.
I know that they make the same easily dismantled arguments that you have regarding hydrological sorting (i'll wait while you google that)
You haven't done the research.
You've googled whatever creationist source you can find and accepted it [i]uncritically [/i]because it says what you [i]want [/i]it to say.
It agrees with the bible.
You don't care about how valid the arguments are, how legitimate the research is or what the bulk of evidence and research actually shows.
You're determined to ignore the scientific consensus where it disagrees with your faith position. You've said as much yourself and so has AiG.
So are we leaving it there or not?馃槒
[quote]I gave you about 20 articles 2 month ago![/quote]
Sorry, no memory of that. 20 seems like a lot so i doubt it.
I know what you have done in the past is link me to AiG.
I know that those articles don't dispute the fossil record as it stands the way you do.
I know that they make the same easily dismantled arguments that you have regarding hydrological sorting (i'll wait while you google that)
You haven't done the research.
You've googled whatever creationist source you can find and accepted it [i]uncritically [/i]because it says what you [i]want [/i]it to say.
It agrees with the bible.
You don't care about how valid the arguments are, how legitimate the research is or what the bulk of evidence and research actually shows.
You're determined to ignore the scientific consensus where it disagrees with your faith position. You've said as much yourself and so has AiG.
So are we leaving it there or not?馃槒
@Bushranger
[quote]he different mass concept always amuses me[/quote]
lol me too. It's absurd. And yet young earth creationists trot it out like it's an actual argument.
Even Answers in Genesis which likes to play at being scientific makes this mistake.
[quote]he different mass concept always amuses me[/quote]
lol me too. It's absurd. And yet young earth creationists trot it out like it's an actual argument.
Even Answers in Genesis which likes to play at being scientific makes this mistake.
Bushranger 路 70-79, M
@Pikachu Using AiG and scientific in the same sentence is probably the biggest oxymoron I've seen.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
@SW-User
Well partially it's just based on living animals but scientists have also been able to determine colour through the fossilized melanosomes.
Well partially it's just based on living animals but scientists have also been able to determine colour through the fossilized melanosomes.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
littlepuppywantanewlife 路 31-35, M
Ew! Looks scary!
littlepuppywantanewlife 路 31-35, M
@Pikachu how would you know it's a male or female?
@littlepuppywantanewlife
On Anurognathus? I don't think we do know. But there are a few pterosaurs with confirmed sexual dimorphism.
On Anurognathus? I don't think we do know. But there are a few pterosaurs with confirmed sexual dimorphism.
Squirrel-turtle-bat
Straylight 路 31-35, F
Looks almost like a moth.
G00GLE 路 22-25, M
What a cutie!