Your future - to be realised, if they can manage it, by 2030

From GlobalResearch.ca, including quotes from the WEF online documentation

[b]Ok with that?
(Just asking. You don't have a choice.)[/b]

[i]Implantable microchips are marketed as the ultimate in convenience, but the goal is to create the Internet of Bodies (IoB), described by the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an ecosystem of “an unprecedented number of sensors,” including emotional sensors, “attached to, implanted within, or ingested into human bodies to monitor, analyze and even modify human bodies and behavior”

Sweden is one of the earliest adopters of implantable microchips. The chip is implanted just beneath the skin on the hand, and operates using either near-field communication (NFC) — the same technology used in smartphones — or radio-frequency identification (RFID), which is used in contactless credit cards
Implanted payment chips are an extension of the internet of things; they’re a way of connecting and exchanging data, and the benefits must be weighed against the potential risks.

Countries around the world are now working on a system for a central bank digital currency (CBDC), a fiat currency in digital form that is programmable so that you can only spend your money on certain things or in specific places, as desired by the issuer.

In the end, everything will be connected to a single implantable device that will hold your digital identity, health data and programmable CBDCs. Your digital identity, in turn, will include everything that can be known about you through surveillance via implanted biosensors, your computer, smartphone, GPS, social media, online searches, purchases and spending habits. Algorithms will then decide what you can and cannot do based on who you are.

While implantable microchips are marketed as the ultimate in convenience, the goal of this trend goes far beyond allowing you to open doors without keys and buy things without your wallet. The goal is to create what’s known as the Internet of Bodies (IoB), described by the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an ecosystem of “an unprecedented number of sensors,” including emotional sensors, “attached to, implanted within, or ingested into human bodies to monitor, analyze and even modify human bodies and behavior

[/i]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

4meAndyou · F

If the WEF is involved, the ultimate goal is control of everyone and everything on the planet for the enrichment of a few really, [i]really[/i] CRAZY effed up people.

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@4meAndyou Even if they dream of that, I can't see it happening! Herding cats is hard enough but herding entire nations is even harder.

4meAndyou · F

@ArishMell I know all about herding cats...that's what the Republican Speaker of the House will have to do in Congress beginning on January 3rd...🤣🤣🤣

PhoenixPhail · M

@ArishMell It's [i]already[/i] happening. Mass formation psychosis is a powerful tool. It's what Hitler used to get the German people to go along with him on killing the Jews. And, the media knows how to lure people into getting people to believe what it shovels. That box in the corner of your room is the greatest control device that's ever been created.
The people are hypnotized and controlled. And a very important part of that hypnosis is getting people to believe that they're conscious, free-willed and self-actualized. They're not.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@ArishMell But the chiefs of the nations are all in on it. Macron, Johnson, Sunak, Merkel - they all went to WEF Schwab's School for Young Globalist Leaders. Yes really. They've all swallowed the message. They're taking their countries down rhe route to One Global government, with the WHO in charge. And the people do nothing. We need to rise up, say no!

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@WalterF Oh, really? These people have enough problems holding their own countries together without trying to fuse them all into one!

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@PhoenixPhail Which "box"?

I have no TV, if that's what you mean. You, and Walter, seem to assume a sort of cohesive unity among all peoples of all countries of all cultures, languages, politics and religions of the world, without which your imagined "mass hypnosis" would not work.

We are human beings, not programmable "smart"-phone circuits! Short of totalitarianism, it is not possible to make everyone believe the same, think the same, etc. The tyrants try it within their own nations, but even they struggle to keep the lid on!

Whoever or whatever the WEF really is, or thinks it is, I don't credit it with being any more than a high-falutin' talking-shop and luncheon-club.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@ArishMell They don't appear to be managing in any way to hold their countries together! Could that not be part of the Great Reset plan? Spend money that doesn't exist on paying people not to work, allow the NHS to lose all credibility, allow 40,000 immigrants in with no attempt to stop them, then put them up for unlimited periods in 5-star hotels at our expense; tax the ordinary man out of existence, while whinging on about "net zero" and cancelling fossil fuels so that we'llhave no end of power cuts this winter and many more winters... Scarcely serious efforts to pull things together, by WEF disciple Sunak + chancellor! More like a concerted effort to destroy our society.

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@WalterF That seems more like bad planning and lack of thought by one government of one country, than wilful policy; and WEF would not achieve the dreams you imagine it has, by bad planning and not thinking!

WalterF · 70-79, M

@ArishMell Unfortunately, that pleasant idea of fat baldy Schwab holds no water. These hiden string-pullers are unconscionably and filthily RICH, with as much power and influence as they have money. They have been preparing this [i]descente aux enfers [/i]for decades (see the marxist Long Walk Through the Institutions concept), and now, they have nearly achieved their aims. Helped by an unashamedly complicit media.

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@WalterF I am not sure why his physical appearance matters, but I don't fear Schwab and his mates anything like you do. If I was a high-flying international currency-speculator I might, but I am not and I've nowt anything his lot might want of me.

Surely though, Marxism would be diametrically opposed to a few odd-bods having a lot of money, so I'd hardly think a Marxist treatise on the Wonderful Extraordinary Fantasy to be sufficiently objective and accurate to be at all informative!

Confined · 56-60, M

@ArishMell covid was invented and released to take over the world. The globalists have already taken over. Cashless society. They claimed there was no coins available to make change, so every one had to use credit cards.
The who has a contract with every countyr in the world they get to take over when the next pandemic is released.

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@Confined Oh really? Come on! I don't really know what "globalists" are because the definition seems conveniently to mean whatever its user wants; but I know you are by no means the only one to suggest something whose logical flaws are so glaring I am surprised anyone really believes it.

As for "everyone had to use credit cards", that may be so where you live, but not round here.

I passed a shop the other day bearing a sign saying "Cash only - no cheques or bank cards"; I also know a pub that does not take credit and debit cards. To be fair though, that is very unusual now. Most shops, pubs, cafes, etc. stopped accepting over-the-counter cheques long ago but do take credit and debit cards [i]as well as cash[/i]. As do many buses.

"had" to use.... Err, past tense, so when did that happen?

Apparently too, many shops' card-readers also accept payment by portable telephone, but I don't have that means; not do I know what it entails or how it works. It does not seem very secure to me. Safe enough, perhaps, for the shops but I would not trust it on my 'phone - which cannot be used in that way anyway.

I make many smaller-order payments by [u]cash[/u] (coins and notes) and long may it continue. [u]Debit[/u] card for larger everyday purchases and for cash from ATMs; [u]credit[/u] card very rarely.

Confined · 56-60, M

@ArishMell During the pandemic in the USA our govt tried to push all digital payments. There were no coins to make change. This went on for almost a full year. I have lots of coins here. So i gave exact change many times.

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@Confined I see! Why did they do that? Was it an attempt to reduce the risk of infecting shop staff by reducing the amount of handling?

WalterF · 70-79, M

@ArishMell In the UK, R.Sunak spoke enthusiastically at the latest gathering of the great and the good (COP27, I think they called it - arrival by private jet only) about the coming Central Bank Digital Currency, of which he is of course in favour.

I have to confess I understand little of high finance (or even low finance). But I read a helpful explanation recently. Apparently, in the current system, billions of transactions go through every day. At the end of the day, banks settle up with each other. A pretty anonymous system for the user.

With the planned (and certain) onset of CBDC, this anonymity will vanish. Each and every transaction by any individual will be known and logged by the system. (To use this system, each person will have to receive a Digital ID.)

In other words - cash no longer being accepted - every one of our purchases will be KNOWN. Each one will be in the vast database of human activities which are being built up, and each one will have our name on it.

End of privacy.

It will be sold to us as a good and postive and safe thing.

But supposing the people who access these records are NOT the honest, decent and upright people we expect to find in positions of authority... suppose they are only interested in control - a bit like the Chinese authorities with their credit system (authorities which Sunak has just refused to condemn as a threat, seeing them as our friends (‽!))...

Check out the UK gov plans for digital currency on the uk.gov website. It's all out there, clearly expressed. They can make it available because nobody ever bothers to look, and, anyway, "we can trust our leaders."

Maybe we are being taken for suckers...