Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

No School at all for Non-Vaccinated Kids in Proposed Law

In the United States, the federal government has now, for the first time in history, proposed a law which will MANDATE non FDA approved covid vaccinations for ALL school children regardless of religious objections, or previous covid infections.

This, despite the fact that the vaccine has been demonstrated NOT to prevent transmission of covid.

This, despite the proved percentages of heart problems in healthy young males who have been vaccinated.

There are no exceptions. No vaccine, no school.

Moderna, and Pfizer in particular refuse to show us their data proving that the vaccine has been adequately tested.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Abstraction · 61-69, M
Source?
- Your statement is not correct. Moderna and Pfizer have released data on their testing from the outset, I followed this all the way through and checked it before making my decisions. You can google and find it. Who is providing you this misinformation?

There is also significant evidence that:
a) "vaccinated people were substantially less likely to become infected or have serious disease."
b) "When people who are vaccinated get COVID-19 get a breakthrough infection, they are much less likely to experience severe symptoms than people who are unvaccinated."
c) "Other study findings suggest that fully or partially vaccinated people who got COVID-19 might be less likely to spread the virus to others."
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/effectiveness/why-measure-effectiveness/breakthrough-cases.html
This is just the first one I found just now. Others have much better later statistics on the higher percentage of mortality and morbidity among the unvaccinated.
4meAndyou · F
@Abstraction Fox news live show. It has been very hard to find links for Calicuz, but the show did state that neither Pfizer nor Moderna want to release their data regarding the long term effects on children.
Abstraction · 61-69, M
@4meAndyou Ah, on children specifically. I didn't pick that up. I'm dreadful at not reading things properly.
https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2022/Moderna-Announces-its-COVID-19-Vaccine-Phase-23-Study-in-Children-6-Months-to-Under-6-Years-Has-Successfully-Met-Its-Primary-Endpoint/default.aspx
Here's one from Moderna that's been around since March. Fox obviously didn't think of checking their site. Or using google. ;)
And there are other studies out there about children:
https://www.tga.gov.au/news/covid-19-vaccine-safety-reports/covid-19-vaccine-safety-report-06-10-2022
This all from 30 seconds googling.
4meAndyou · F
@Abstraction You're not to be blamed. I see different words sometimes than what has actually been written. It's a trick of both the mind and the eye.

The point is, in two years there is certainly no [i]long term study or data available, [/i]and with children, we have to worry about myocarditis in young heathy males, and sterilization in young girls.