So lets do a logical analysis of the quran. The quran was written by one man. It is an outlier in that no other religious text agrees with it or points to it. In fact several religious texts warn against it.

The writer of the quran is not to be doubted or questioned or even thought about other than to someone who should be emulated. Any sexual immorality or theft or killing known to have been done by said individual is to be completely ignored.

The writer of the quran often contradicts himself and even withdrew several passages of the quran saying that he was fooled by the devil when he proclaimed them.

The followers of quran are constantly looking for justification of their erroneous belief by dragging other texts or subjects not related or found in the quran claiming them to be proof of the correctness of the quran. Thus the quran followers try to quote the Bible (a book they say is corrupted ) and science a subject they know nothing about to support their unquestioning trust in the quran.

To question the quran or the author of the quran (mohammed was an illiterate brigand and a sexual deviant) is taboo. The followers of the quran can not question it nor can they stand for anyone else to question it. If you question it or the author of it you are likely to have a fatwa pronounced upon you and you don't know the day of the hour when some zealot will cut your head off.

The funny part is the the quran's author tried to use the Jewish Torah as the basis of many of his proscriptions. Very strange how he tried to be Jewish but hated Jews.

Now what does the Bible say? The son of the slave woman shall not inherit the kingdom. Who is the son of the slave woman? The very one that the author of the quran tried to trace his religious heritage to. Thus the quran and all its 'laws' are ineffective in gaining right standing with God.

Actually, the ordering of the books in the Quran follows the same rationale as the ordering of Paul's letters in the bible: the books go from longest to shortest. (A few exception with Paul, when two letters are addressed to the same community.) And the reason this was common, not just in religious literature, was that writing materials were difficult to obtain. So people wrote the longer works first, while papyrus, vellum, or paper was in supply, and then proceeded to shorter and shorter works as they used up their pile. This would apply to all the copyists through the ages, for both the Quran and the Bible, and thus that order came to be traditional.

Brain washing at its best.

[quote]Critics argue, verses which allegedly explain modern scientific facts, about subjects such as biology, the origin and history of the Earth, and the evolution of human life, contain fallacies and are unscientific.[77][78][79]

As of 2008, both Muslims and non-Muslims have disputed whether there actually are "scientific miracles" in the Quran. Muslim critics of the movement include Indian Islamic theologian Maulana Ashraf ‘Ali Thanvi, Muslim historian Syed Nomanul Haq, Muzaffar Iqbal, president of Center for Islam and Science in Alberta, Canada, and Egyptian Muslim scholar Khaled Montaser.[80] The movement has been dismissed as the product of a “deep, deep inferiority complex”, “apologia of the worst type.” [/quote]

[quote]Pakistani theoretical physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy writes that

[i]the problem with such claims to ownership is that they lack an explanation for why quantum mechanics, molecular genetics, etc., had to await discovery elsewhere. Nor is any kind of testable prediction ever made. No reason is offered as to why antibiotics, aspirin, steam engines, electricity, aircraft, or computers were not first invented by Muslims. But even to ask such questions is considered offensive.[/i][81][80] [/quote]

[quote] Critics argue that while it is generally agreed the Quran contains many verses proclaiming the wonders of nature, it requires[b] "considerable mental gymnastics and distortions to find scientific facts or theories in these verses"[/b] (Ziauddin Sardar);[60]

that the Quran is the source of guidance in right faith (iman) and righteous action (alladhina amanu wa amilu l-salihat) but the idea that it contained "all knowledge, including scientific" knowledge has not been a mainstream view among Muslim scholarship (Zafar Ishaq Ansari);[62][need quotation to verify]


[b]"Science is ever-changing ... the Copernican revolution overturning polemic models of the universe to Einstein's general relativity overshadowing Newtonian mechanisms".[8] So while "Science is probabilistic in nature" the Quran deals in "absolute certainty"[/b]. (Ali Talib);[86]


Nidhal Guessoum has also been highly critical of "pseudo-scientific claims" made about the Quran.[52]


Critics also argue that some classical beliefs based on interpretations of the Quran have been abandoned following the introduction of modern technology/science in the Muslim world. Nidhal Guessoum points out (as noted above), that a literal interpretation of some Quranic verses indicates that before a baby is born its gender is known only to God, i.e. is Al-Ghaib. [b]This was what Muslims believed for centuries, but ultrasound technology has "led many Muslims to realize that first-degree readings of the Quran can lead to contradictions and predicaments"[/b].[ [/quote]

[b]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_attitudes_towards_science[/b]

Science is a [i]methodology[/i], not a collection of results. So even if you can interpret verses in this or that holy book to imply Schrodinger's Equation, you don't have the methodology that led Schrodinger to propose his equation nor the methodology that tested it.

[quote]Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. When someone says 'science teaches such and such', he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn't teach it; experience teaches it.[/quote]
— Richard P. Feynman

[quote]If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science.[/quote] — Richard P. Feynman

A question for the people who are reacting to this post, bcz they have nothing to say.
What would u like to say about the scientific signs mentioned in the Quran!
Is that all already mentiomed in the bible and could Muhammed have known all that?

We should expect the proof for our reality to consist of more than some greatly exaggerated claims about a book.

So, I'm going to address these one by one, because I'm bored.

1. In your opinion.

2. WTF is divine order? That sounds like some bullshit somebody made up.

3. You mean one person wrote it instead of 60 or 70. Big deal. I've written fiction before.

4. I'd love to hear you explain the science behind riding a flying horse to the moon to cut it in half with a sword.

5. Big whoop. It's been copied perfectly. I can name half a dozen books like that. Are they all inspired by your particular god?

6. It's popular, therefore it's right? What a joke. I can think of several books that are more popular. Do they also contain the divine truth?

7. Okay, so it's got some shit in it that nobody knows where it came from. Automatically that means it came from your god?

8. Prove it.

I heard that they copied the bible and just changed some details and names.

I already told you, it's just fan fiction written by a warlord come cult leader based off of Jewish mythology. It's not real. And there are FAR better written books than the quran,

Do you believe in a flying horse with face of a human?

No