Exciting
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Was Quran the only book which wasn't corrupted and what proof is there that it is really the last book of guidance?

1- It is revealed in one of the most eloquent languages that were ever there in the world and its name was giiven by Allah himself, Quran.

2- It has divine order and not chronological order like any otehr book.

3-It is revealed to one Prophet and so there are less chances of error.

4- Even though Quran is more of a book of signs, it has science in it too, it explains the universe is expanding, it hints to the big bang, it describes how the human body of fromed before birth, it expalisn everything in the universe is in am orbit,it has Ocean disivison, it exains about iron within meteorites , it describes how clouds are formed, the structure of mountains, aboud pain receptors and it shows many signs. how could any normal human, or prophet who can't read and write get to know all that from no where, this is surely the best proof that Muhammed pbuh couldn't have just wrote the Quran, it is from God.

5- Since it was complied no single word has changed ever and it is word to word.

6-Millions have other memorized in their hearts.

7- Previous scriptures we dont exactly k ow where they were revealed, hut For Quran the revelation started at cave of Hira and that place is still there.

8-No one is capable to write a book like Quran, bcz its inimitable.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
A question for the people who are reacting to this post, bcz they have nothing to say.
What would u like to say about the scientific signs mentioned in the Quran!
Is that all already mentiomed in the bible and could Muhammed have known all that?
@MuslimBarbie I'll give it to you that point 4 is interesting, if true. I can't read Arabic though, so I can't judge how detailed and accurate it is. The other reasons are very weak as proof.
@NerdyPotato okay, good u like atleast one.
Its fine if u dont understand or know arabic...
I suggest u to try reading this, it includes all details regarding point 4.
https://zamzam.com/blog/scientific-facts-in-quran/
@MuslimBarbie it starts out with two reasonable descriptions, but it starts falling apart afterwards. I'm no expert on confluxes, but think there is a small amount of mixing and there is definitely no barrier between the oceans. Comparing a baby to a leech is fair, but starting with an extract from clay is plain false. Sending iron down can just as well be interpreted as moving iron from mines to settlements and doesn't have to refer to a meteorite.

And then there is the issue of confirmation bias. A few examples of accurate predictions are interesting, but as there are other predictions that didn't come true, it looks more like a buckshot with a few lucky hits.

So even the most intriguing of your 9 arguments does not prove anything.