I have no real draw towards this action - but I do like to be a pleasing sexual partner. I get the most of my personal pleasure by knowing I provided the most pleasure to her. As a result, I have gotten fairly reasonable at getting girls to reach orgasm. In fact, I usually ask what their prior "record" of the number of O's in a single sexual encounter is, and then I set that as my benchmark. I usually have this "maximum number of O's" conversation at a flirty time, but NOT right before sex. It's just information I remember with purpose.
Many girls only make a bit of fluid (during an orgasm), but every girl does produce additional fluid when she actually has an orgasm. I believe that some girls are more "expressive" in this way, and it's likely both a combination of genuine arousal (if you really get her going, compared to just getting her going; you often can tell the difference) and of genetics.
This gushing thing they put into porn so much now is kinda weird, in my opinion. I believe the vast majority of this type of "gushing" is actually pee. It's not like we finally learned something about sex that prior generations NEVER were able to learn. They probably had A LOT more sex than we do, so it's doubtful we really improved by such leaps and bounds.
If comparison to male ejaculation is valuable, then it's likely true that when females ejaculate a significant amount of fluid - it has been a good amount of time between that moment and the last time the female had enjoyed fully pleasurable sex. Just for comparison, if I fool around with a girl, but I do not reach my climax; and I then have a sexual encounter perhaps a week or a few days later on; the volume of my ejaculate is certainly increased. There is likely a line, where the prior excitement is just too far in the past, to add any additional volume to the standard ejaculate production amount.
I hope that was helpful! I tried to just answer the question, I don't really get turned on by female ejaculate. It's more their enjoyment that I appreciate.
