SW-User
Max 3. Can be less
View 4 more replies »
Virtually · 31-35, M
@PoetryNEmotion I agree but if I was rich I'm not even sure what my limit would be.
PoetryNEmotion · F
@Virtually Numbers are irrelevant. They must have love no matter how many they are. And that takes two to start and to build upon.
PoetryNEmotion · F
I used to say at minimum 3. I had one. I will always wonder if I had been with someone else would I have had 3 or 4 ? People should get what they want.
3 like we have, is perfect for us.
SW-User
0-2
Sicarium · 46-50, M
0.
RoxClymer · 41-45, M
0
Laughable · M
😴
oneperson · 31-35, M
are you middle class or below?