This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BlueVeins · 22-25
It would just have to be Jesus. We know very little about his life, and the sources we have about him are very unreliable. Homeboi has had a monumental impact on global culture over the past couple thousand years, so understanding him is really important; plus, he could explain parts of his teachings which are misunderstood or disputed (which is almost all of it lmao). I also think seeing Jesus as the haggardly, unkempt arab that he probably was would have a positive impact on race & class relations. As a cherry on top, doctors and historians could probably run medical tests on him to learn more about life in the old Roman Empire.
Incomplet · 22-25
@BlueVeins
So?
You'r not letting him tak a bath , shav his beard, dress, wear shoes and liv as everyon today does? Will you allow him to learn English, see the World as it is, experienc Living as a Modern Person?
I also think seeing Jesus as the haggardly, unkempt arab that he probably was would have a positive impact on race & class relations.
So?
You'r not letting him tak a bath , shav his beard, dress, wear shoes and liv as everyon today does? Will you allow him to learn English, see the World as it is, experienc Living as a Modern Person?
smileylovesgaming · 31-35, F
@BlueVeins I think he meant someone that existed not made up
BlueVeins · 22-25
@smileylovesgaming ehhhh from what i read, historians lean towards jesus having existed as a single person, or at least being a composite character of multiple cult leaders in israel at the time. Even if the latter's the case, the name 'Jesus' has got to have come from someone in particular, so you'd still get a viable person to bring back.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Incomplet So?
Jesus was big on dousing himself with perfume.
You'r not letting him tak a bath , shav his beard, dress, wear shoes and liv as everyon today does? Will you allow him to learn English, see the World as it is, experienc Living as a Modern Person?
Jesus was big on dousing himself with perfume.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@BlueVeins
The name "Jesus" did not exist before around 1630 A.D. The character had another name. "Jesus" was simply made up as a translation, like all of the other main characters' names in the Bible.
ehhhh from what i read, historians lean towards jesus having existed as a single person, or at least being a composite character of multiple cult leaders in israel at the time. Even if the latter's the case, the name 'Jesus' has got to have come from someone in particular, so you'd still get a viable person to bring back.
The name "Jesus" did not exist before around 1630 A.D. The character had another name. "Jesus" was simply made up as a translation, like all of the other main characters' names in the Bible.