This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
dirge · M
I'm having some trouble with the base assumption; that AI would create something that I'd call 'beautiful'. from everything I've seen, I can imagine calling ai art 'impressive', but I've yet to see anything I'd call beautiful. I'm a but torn, I feel like I want what I call art to take effort and/or talent. and maybe AI art takes a whole lot of prompt crafting that I don't know about, but it doesn't seem or sound like it.
anyway, overall I think I'd have a hard time calling it art. maybe I'd be more able to if someone included the prompt work they did with the presentation of the ai results, I'm usually more interested in 'the making of' any given art, but that might just be me.
overall - probably not, but I'm not saying that's a hard line. art is always moving and changing. 100 years ago, the idea of a movie being an art form would have been largely laughable.
anyway, overall I think I'd have a hard time calling it art. maybe I'd be more able to if someone included the prompt work they did with the presentation of the ai results, I'm usually more interested in 'the making of' any given art, but that might just be me.
overall - probably not, but I'm not saying that's a hard line. art is always moving and changing. 100 years ago, the idea of a movie being an art form would have been largely laughable.


