Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Have Random Thoughts

Someone on here said they wanted to block me, but didn't want to "waste a block."

SW allows you to block 500 people; what kind of person has blocked so many people on here where running out of blocks would be a concern? If you need to block that many people, maybe it's time to delete your account and essentially block everyone.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TexChik · F
So people now no longer have the right to block poeple that offend them because it offends you ? Get over yourself .
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@TexChik When did I say that I don't think someone has the right to block me or that I'm offended? You're reading your own obsessions into my statement. I'm just sharing how I think a person has a problem if they've had to block so many people on here that they are close to hitting 500.
TexChik · F
@Lila15 you said if they needed to block “ [b][i]that many[/i][/b]” that they should delete their account . Those are your words , you wrote them . I think a person should be able to do as they please within the TOS of this site . VIP’s have 5000 blocks . And you assumed the person had used up their 500 blocks ... rather than acknowledge their intended insult that you weren’t worth the trouble of blocking . 🤷🏻‍♀️
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@TexChik You don't think someone has a problem with this site if they have to block so many people that they even have to think about reaching 500? I'll bet a lot of the people that person has blocked don't even have accounts on here. And no, she wasn't saying I'm not worth blocking; she was actually debating over whether she should use up a precious block on me.

People can do what they want; it's interesting how you got your panties in a bunch just because I expressed an opinion. It's hilarious how conservatives complain about liberals being "offended" when conservatives get offended at the drop of a hat.
TexChik · F
@Lila15 how can you be on here and not have an account ? I do t yokeratke pissers, poopers or diaper freaks , or pedophiles... and there’s about 500 of them
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@TexChik Seriously? You're so sensitive, you can't stand to see posts from people you don't even know, just because of the subject matter? And people say liberals are "snowflakes."

If I see a post on a topic I disapprove of, I just ignore it and move on.

"OMG a post about pooping - help, must block immediately!"
TexChik · F
@Lila15 yep perverts talking about squishing in the poop they just had in their diaper don’t belong in my feed .

And why is it any of your business what someone chooses to do with their own accounts ? I don’t recall reading in the TOS that any changes in my personal preferences required your approval . I must have missed that 🙄🙄🙄.
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@TexChik When did I say it was my business? It sounds like you don't think I should express an opinion. Kind of a double standard, don't you think? You certainly haven't been shy about expressing [i]your[/i] opinion.
TexChik · F
@Lila15 when did I say that? You’re the one dumping on anyone who blocks ...
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@TexChik No, I'm not "dumping on anyone who blocks." I'm saying that if someone is so close to their 500-block limit that they have to assess whether the next person who offends them can be blocked or not, they may not belong on social media.

And no, I'm not saying they should be kicked off, so don't put words in my mouth.

If someone is afraid of riding motorcycles and only goes 5 mph on one, would you say that maybe that person might be happier if they didn't ride a motorcycle? Or is that offensive because it sounds like they're saying all motorcycles should be illegal?