Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
fakable · T
you're right

but
in order to apply this method of thinking you must know what is right and wrong
it is impossible

it is possible only to limit the formulation of questions by artificial rules which imply optimization of the considered process

for example, the rules of marketing: minimum costs - maximum profits
etc.
soberSimplicity · 18-21, T
@fakable Well if I apply a little bit of Problematization to this;

Firstly, who is to consider that there are strict ontological / epistemological boundaries between right and wrong? In that the sense that you even mean that in? Is it an ethical moral sense? Or is about epistemology?

I don't necessarily want to make this the point of a long 100 message reply argument over the nature of rightness, correctness, and wrongness, but its not within my personal belief and philosophy that those are so clearly defined and cut. There are *better questions*, not really right questions, for instance. And I do say "wrong questions" but I mean that more in "questions that don't make sense outside of themselves".

As for that second part about formulation of questions and optimization of the process, could you elaborate? I believe I get what you're trying to say but I am not certain.
fakable · T
@soberSimplicity
direction can only exist in the coordinate system

a system of coordinates can only be created in a model of reality

a model of reality exists only in your mind

discussing these issues is useless, but amusing

So, in short...question your questions .🤷
soberSimplicity · 18-21, T
@OogieBoogie Yes, in short. Especially questioning the nature of questions and who is asking though.

 
Post Comment