Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Problematization

To put it pretty simply; problematization it is to question not only one's own questions, but the questions that surround oneself as well.

Analyzing one's basic questions about the world is a good way to find better answers for the world. Often we are looking for correct answers for wrong questions. The nature of a correct answer to a wrong question is still of wrongness.

Questions and problems often implicitly have answers involved within them, even if we must find or otherwise solve them, making the implicit more explicit. Therefore, better questions answer themselves more effectively. The answers they give are more insightful and provide more value for the circumstances at hand.

Sometimes the journey and method isn't one of finding correct answers but instead better questions. Better questions than we previously had. A reproblematization to forward our understanding.

Its very much a struggle for politics I find, a lot of people ask questions that can seem nonsensical when enlightened by other questions. Convenient questions are often sought for in politics, convenient questions, of course, allowing for convenient world views. When problemization is applied though, often these same conveniences become hollow.

A lot of people could / should use this when looking at data too. Sometimes the simple answers that one can extract from data isn't accurate if only because we've failed to look at it with the right questions.

I could continue on probably but the point is made (I hope).
fakable · T
you're right

but
in order to apply this method of thinking you must know what is right and wrong
it is impossible

it is possible only to limit the formulation of questions by artificial rules which imply optimization of the considered process

for example, the rules of marketing: minimum costs - maximum profits
etc.
soberSimplicity · 18-21, T
@fakable Well if I apply a little bit of Problematization to this;

Firstly, who is to consider that there are strict ontological / epistemological boundaries between right and wrong? In that the sense that you even mean that in? Is it an ethical moral sense? Or is about epistemology?

I don't necessarily want to make this the point of a long 100 message reply argument over the nature of rightness, correctness, and wrongness, but its not within my personal belief and philosophy that those are so clearly defined and cut. There are *better questions*, not really right questions, for instance. And I do say "wrong questions" but I mean that more in "questions that don't make sense outside of themselves".

As for that second part about formulation of questions and optimization of the process, could you elaborate? I believe I get what you're trying to say but I am not certain.
fakable · T
@soberSimplicity
direction can only exist in the coordinate system

a system of coordinates can only be created in a model of reality

a model of reality exists only in your mind

discussing these issues is useless, but amusing
So, in short...question your questions .🤷
soberSimplicity · 18-21, T
@OogieBoogie Yes, in short. Especially questioning the nature of questions and who is asking though.

 
Post Comment