Sharing a link to an article as "proof" isn't proof if the article just says its proof

Ya know... without actually showing the proof in the article...

You're just shifting the proof responsibility to somewhere else

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

stound

I find all of it pretty frustrating. this is social(ish) media; not a court case. demands of proof seem kinda silly at best.

but maybe I'm using sw entirely incorrectly.

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

@stound Agreed. I used to bother to provide links with evidence, but either it doesn't get read, or the person finds something to cherry pick in there that is completely irrelevant and uses that to deny the proof.