Sharing a link to an article as "proof" isn't proof if the article just says its proof

Ya know... without actually showing the proof in the article...

You're just shifting the proof responsibility to somewhere else

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

So you need people to spoon feed you the proof? What's wrong with reading the article on your own? Don't you want the context so you can decided if it sounds legitimate or not?

Fishy · 36-40, F

@SumKindaMunster Thing is, I do read the articles but the articles they link don't even contain proof or sources to proof...

basically their proof is just because someone else said so : /

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

@Fishy Ah gotcha. I get where you are coming from now.