@SW-User Woooo! Look at all those big numbers! That's enough to scare everybody!
But the real news is in the little numbers! Unless your old and/or have other certain health issues, the chances of covid taking you down are infinitesimally SMALL!
SW-User
@Budwick no the answer is excess deaths. We're seeing tens of thousands excess deaths that shows the damage that covid is doing.
Excess deaths? This is a new one. Is the left making some deaths more significant than others some how?
SW-User
@Budwick go read David Spiegelhalter's writing on risk and covid. Of youre under 30 yes hardly any noticeable risk. But the risk doubles (remember that risk / probability is essentially a logrhythmic scale) every 10 years of age so once your over 40 you should be concerned and once over 60 very concerned over 70 extremely concerned.
SW-User
@Budwick excess deaths is a known measure epidemiologists use to measure impact of epidemics and new illnesses or to show health improvements in societies.
@SW-User David Spiegelhalter? A statistician? He's writing on covid?
You ever heard that saying? 'Figures lie and liars figure'
Tell you what Nunos - YOU look at the real world. The common, every day people have it figured out. Covid is bad, but can be easily be avoided. Maybe not 100%, but it's a risk worth taking to maintain a quality of life.
@SW-User CDC - And they always get it right! Well, sometimes.
SW-User
@Budwick I love how you dismiss the experts who have spent decades learning and studying something and determine you know better.
🤷♂️
I generally find if I want to know something the best people to listen to are the experts.
So you quote risk but decline to listen to one of the world leading authorities on statistical risk.
My final word. I know two icu nurses. They are working up to 15 hour shifts saving lives. When they tell me the lockdown should continue I think they know far more than me.
Experts learn to refine their theories based on experience (or experiment). The fact they aren't 100% correct at the beginning of a pandemic is hardly unexpected.
Tell it to the Swedish government. I'm sure they have their own expert epidemiologists and statisticians.
The Swedes have not gone on shutdown, presumably on the calculation that the total number of Covid deaths will be roughly the same, whether spread out over a few months, or over a year or two. They seem to have concluded that the former approach, which at least partially avoids the economic consequences, is better, as long as the healthcare system is not overwhelmed.
“Covid-19 deaths in Sweden were the highest in Europe per capita in a rolling seven-day average between 12 and 19 May.” It confirmed that Sweden’s state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell’s “mitigation” strategy of allowing shops, restaurants, gyms, schools and workplaces to remain open was a deadly folly. It does not even seem to have produced herd immunity. Just 7.3% of Stockholm’s inhabitants had developed Covid-19 antibodies by the end of April.
UK has 5% nationally and 17% in London with our lockdown and we still have the highest outright European death total.
How does an elected government go back to the people to be reelected when you've stats like that? Well I'd never vote them in again.
"How does an elected government go back to the people to be reelected when you've stats like that?"
Maybe (political rarity of rarities) they are doing what they think is best in the long run? And, as I said before, I'm sure they have their own experts.
"Well I'd never vote them in again."
Never...? Perhaps you would, if after a couple of years their approach turned out to have minimized the overall damage.
SW-User
@Thinkerbell 🤔 We'll see. Be surprised though. Never have we encountered a human transmission coronavirus which provides long term immunity once infected. Average immunity about 6 months. So can they sustain highest per capita death rate for years to come?
We will indeed see. And if Covid-19 stays around indefinitely (whatever happened to SARS and MERS?), what's the alternative? To have most small businesses go bankrupt? How long can that be sustained?
They seem to have concluded that the former approach, which at least partially avoids the economic consequences, is better, as long as the healthcare system is not overwhelmed.
I want some of THEIR experts! Ours wear lab coats, likely took the Hippocratic oath - they're not allowed to care about anything else.