This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SinlessOnslaught · M
No, art is only a social contribution to society (as opposed to actual or tangible) and if your social contributions come with bad character, they'll have undertones that are harmful to the world. Paintings are pretty but if one was made by someone who thinks eugenics are a good idea, that painting sure won't be in on my wall.
This also comes with having responsibility and not overdoing it when judging someone's character. For example, someone disagreeing with me does not immediately mean they believe in crazy things like that.
This also comes with having responsibility and not overdoing it when judging someone's character. For example, someone disagreeing with me does not immediately mean they believe in crazy things like that.
@SinlessOnslaught I very much disagree with your definition of art, as I strongly believe it can be actual or tangible.
Such as Pythagorean has a Cult that believed in some things which we would consider evil today, but he/they also taught the Pythagorean theorem which is still taught today.
Such as Pythagorean has a Cult that believed in some things which we would consider evil today, but he/they also taught the Pythagorean theorem which is still taught today.



