Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What is Greta Thunberg's advice?

Now that Europe is facing perhaps its biggest energy crisis of all time, I haven't heard anything from Greta. Europe has been pretending to transition to alternative green energy sources that either don't yet exist, or don't exist in sufficient quantities to be useful. But in reality of course Europe simply became addicted to Russia, as some guy named Trump in 2018 pointed out while the Gemans laughed heartily:

[media=https://youtu.be/FfJv9QYrlwg]


People in Germany are now panicking and cutting down wood to use wherever they can get it. People in Poland are waiting in long queues for coal. Britain is facing financial and energy chaos. Europe is reverting to the Dark Ages. So what is Greta's advice? How does she solve this real world problem? She is Europe's energy policy czar. Why the silence?
Guess she went back to playing with her dolls.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Philth · 46-50, M
I expected that the comments on this post would represent a festival of fuckwittery and I'm not disappointed. Taking each point in turn:

Greta has never real had any advice of her own; her message is simply to draw attention to the fact that for decades we've been burying our heads in the sand and ignoring the advice of the scientific communities' majority stance, which is that man-made emissions are responsible for climate change and if we don't act to reduce them, we can expect to see a terrible outcome with great suffering and hardship.

"ohh, but she's getting paid, she's a puppet" - what, and the thick bastards saying this haven't figured there's 1000 times more corrupt politicians and media figures who are taking the money to support the fossil fuel industry, all to increase the wealth of obscenely wealthy old men who know that they'll be dead before things get too hot (literally) for them?

Yes, far too many countries have been reliant on Russian energy sources, I'll refer you back to the politcians. Britain, for example had a choice back in the 1980s during the political war upon coal miners whether to start investing in green energy to retain our relative independence in that sector, or... Yup, instead we opened a load of gas fired power stations, with the Government telling us that Britain's energy needs could be met cheaper and more reliably by relying upon imported energy from abroad. This is what you get when political ideology (wanting to crush the miner's unions at all costs) meets the short-term profiteering of the neoliberal free-market economy (cheers, Maggie).

In splitting up the UK's energy market we lost the ability to design and build our own power stations, the expertise has been divided, scattered. Again, cheers Maggie. But hey, we defeated 'the enemy within', right?

That's just in the UK but I expect its a similar situation certainly across Europe.

Meanwhile as this post tragically demonstrates, there's a bunch of folk whose thinking goes only as far as the price of filling up their 5.7litre pickup which they use to go to the shops or for pose value, who welcome the 'disappearance' of Greta as if it means there isn't an issue with climate change at all. Because its much easier to think that it'll all be OK and we can go back to how it was in the good ole days.

Try telling the people in Pakistan that, the latest nation to get ravaged by extreme weather events, or any of the coastal communities whose homes are literally disappearing under rising seas. Or the inland parts of the world where people are literally frying.

I can guess the likely response, especially since the ignorance required to be a climate change denier often goes hand in hand with other predjudices: and that will be they don't care about Pakistan because its a nation of brown people.

Back to Greta. Right now I expect she's wondering what it takes for people to wake up. Yes, people are hoarding coal and wood. That's not because they are the best energy sources but because they're the most dependable under the situation of Governments across the world not having taken energy creation and use, seriously enough.

Personally I think she might be planning on buying a large bowl of popcorn and sitting back to watch nations like America shoot themselves into extinction in a 'mad max' internal energy war.
irishmolly72 · 56-60, F
@Philth [quote]Greta has never real had any advice of her own; her message is simply to draw attention to the fact that for decades we've been burying our heads in the sand and ignoring the advice of the scientific communities' majority stance[/quote]

The scientific community was warning about [b]global cooling [/b]in the 1970s. 🤣
irishmolly72 · 56-60, F
@Philth [quote]there's 1000 times more corrupt politicians and media figures...[/quote]

Such as this guy:

[image deleted]
He's a guy Putin could do "business" with.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
irishmolly72 · 56-60, F
@Philth [quote] Britain, for example had a choice back in the 1980s during the political war upon coal miners...[/quote]

Hillary Clinton 2016:
[quote]
WILLIAMSON, W.V. Hillary Clinton apologized on Monday for saying she would put coal miners and companies "out of business" as president, calling her comment a "misstatement."

"What I said was totally out of context from what I meant," Clinton said. "It was a misstatement, because what I was saying is that the way things are going now, we will continue to lose jobs."[/quote]

The left always wants it both ways. 🤣
Slade · 56-60, M
@irishmolly72 Of course. Since they never can narrow down their gender
OggggO · 36-40, M
@irishmolly72 [quote]The scientific community was warning about global cooling in the 1970s.[/quote]
Spotpot · 41-45, M
@irishmolly72 Taken out of context anyway coal is dead.
SW-User
[quote]festival of fuckwittery[/quote]

[b]And how!!![/b]

@Philth
graphite · 61-69, M
@Philth @Philth https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/