Conventional wisdom holds that after the perceived failure of Bush, the Global Financial Crisis, the bailouts, the Great Recession, the prolonged wars in the Middle East, the rise of China as a serious competitor, and in the wake of trade-related economic dislocations and greater inequality, Donald Trump single-handedly managed to assemble a new populist movement within the GOP and thus conquered the American political right.
There‘s certainly some truth to that, but it’s not the whole story. In fact, Trump’s true base has never been the relatively new, formerly marginalized, populist wing of the GOP but the White Christian Nationalists. Needless to say, one can surely debate the proper terminology to describe this group. Pew Research, for instance, affectionately named the group “Faith and Flag Conservatives“.
They are the red, beating heart of today‘s Republican Party and they are best understood as the group who felt the country was slipping away from them due to cultural liberalization or cultural shifts to the left.
The Populist Right, the other component of the MAGA base, on the other hand, felt that the country was economically slipping away from them.
To illustrate this point:
The patter that emerges is incontrovertible. Faith & Flag Conservatives aka arch-conservatives are the largest, the most politically active, and the most loyalist voting bloc on the right. And while their share is equal to the share of the Populist Right, the Populist Right is generally less aligned with the Committed Conservatives and the Ambivalent Conservatives who all, more or less, concur with the Faith & Flag Conservatives’ outlook on economic and foreign policy. Hence, the Populist Right is still rather awkwardly isolated in policy terms on the right.
What that means is that no one should be surprised that Josh Hawley‘s not in charge of crafting this administration‘s economic agenda nor should anyone be surprised that Tucker Carlson and Majorie Taylor Greene aren’t determining Trump’s foreign policy. There are, of course, exceptions where Trump‘s personally more aligned with the populist views (at least for now) and these particular issues include military aid to Ukraine, antitrust policy and global trade.
That said, these numbers help explain why the OBBB‘s cuts to Medicaid, Obamacare, SNAP and industrial policy subsidies paired with extensive tax curs are not as politically toxic for Trump as one might expect. Sure, so far the median voter is still skeptical but the collective and vigorous support among Committed Conservatives (aka Reaganite conservatives) and Faith & Flag conservatives simply outweighs the dissenters among the Populist Right faction of the party. A similar dynamic is in play as far as Trump’s Middle East policy is concerned.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@samueltyler2 Well, I didn’t pick Pew Research‘s name for the group. But radical is an extremely empty adjective in any case. They chose a more meaningful and descriptive moniker.
@samueltyler2 Well I‘m not “they” and I wouldn’t call anyone in the US by that name. I‘d reserve that term for the leadership of Cuba and Venezuela. I would, however, call representatives of the Democratic Party‘s left-wing either left-wing populists or socialists.
@CedricH i spent years in the South, that cry does frighten me, but I hear the far right coopting the term radical to describe those of us with empathy and want to help others. We need to find a get even upgrade b
@samueltyler2 The etymological meaning of radical is “to the roots”. Something can technically be radically good. Depends on the point of view and the issue at hand.
@samueltyler2 Using labels to discredit ideas is always lazy. I‘m sure your views are broadly aligned with regular European social democratic or green parties. I don’t agree with their policy positions or values but I would never suggest that they’re in any way extremist. As long as one is committed to a free and democratic society without racism or anti-semitism, I‘m tolerant of whatever views one might have within that spectrum.
