This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
If they really do carry out such a plan, would that not be erasing parts of your country's history?
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@ArishMell
Their real intent is to erase all historical references to Black people in America. Therefore, they will throw in a few other things to hide their true agenda. They hate the idea of Blacks getting social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid which is why those programs are under attack. They don't care about the millions of Whites who will suffer when those programs are eliminated.
If they really do carry out such a plan, would that not be erasing parts of your country's history?
Their real intent is to erase all historical references to Black people in America. Therefore, they will throw in a few other things to hide their true agenda. They hate the idea of Blacks getting social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid which is why those programs are under attack. They don't care about the millions of Whites who will suffer when those programs are eliminated.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Diotrephes So the DoD's decision is just cheap, official smokescreening?
Convivial does not mention the Afro-Americans, but even with your explanation I cannot see any point in censoring the country's military history.
Becuase these examples are about individual people, excising references to a medal of honour, or to the first woman infantry soldier, would be mere pettyness, even cowardice, by the unknown officials.
The bomber, though, represents an episode the whole world should always remember, learn from and never repeat.
Where will it end? Even before this, last year we heard of some US school libraries being closed entirely for holding books not to the taste of obscure external committees. Now the DoD seems trying to censor the USA's military history. To whose benefit?
Not only, what is it telling Americans. What is it telling the rest of the world?
Convivial does not mention the Afro-Americans, but even with your explanation I cannot see any point in censoring the country's military history.
Becuase these examples are about individual people, excising references to a medal of honour, or to the first woman infantry soldier, would be mere pettyness, even cowardice, by the unknown officials.
The bomber, though, represents an episode the whole world should always remember, learn from and never repeat.
Where will it end? Even before this, last year we heard of some US school libraries being closed entirely for holding books not to the taste of obscure external committees. Now the DoD seems trying to censor the USA's military history. To whose benefit?
Not only, what is it telling Americans. What is it telling the rest of the world?
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@ArishMell
Do you know how many Black Marine fighter pilots there were in 2023? 5
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/10/16/marines-black-fighter-pilots/
There are 60 Black fighter pilots in the Air Force and 15 Black fighter pilots in the Navy.
That racism goes back to WWII. Like George Wallace said = "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever."
That is why they went nuts over Affirmative Action and are killing the DEI program in all segments of American society. And, it is why the social benefit programs are under attack. Their intent is to restore Jim Crow and eventually reinstitute chattle slavery.
Now the DoD seems trying to censor the USA's military history. To whose benefit?
Not only, what is it telling Americans. What is it telling the rest of the world?
Not only, what is it telling Americans. What is it telling the rest of the world?
Do you know how many Black Marine fighter pilots there were in 2023? 5
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/10/16/marines-black-fighter-pilots/
There are 60 Black fighter pilots in the Air Force and 15 Black fighter pilots in the Navy.
That racism goes back to WWII. Like George Wallace said = "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever."
That is why they went nuts over Affirmative Action and are killing the DEI program in all segments of American society. And, it is why the social benefit programs are under attack. Their intent is to restore Jim Crow and eventually reinstitute chattle slavery.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Diotrephes What a tragic state of affairs. When will such prejudice end?
Racism and related attitudes are by no means just American; and by no means just between white and black.
Other countries have brought in laws that broadly ban discrimination, rather than trying to enforce what is rather absurdly called "positive discrimination".
On the whole these seems to work fairly well, but it is extremely difficult to educate people out of deeply-entrenched social attitudes originating generations ago - in WW2 as you say, but well before that.
Ironically it might be easier where the original prejudice was openly hostile, than where it was a sort of patronising that was held to be for "their" benefit, at the time.
Racism and related attitudes are by no means just American; and by no means just between white and black.
Other countries have brought in laws that broadly ban discrimination, rather than trying to enforce what is rather absurdly called "positive discrimination".
On the whole these seems to work fairly well, but it is extremely difficult to educate people out of deeply-entrenched social attitudes originating generations ago - in WW2 as you say, but well before that.
Ironically it might be easier where the original prejudice was openly hostile, than where it was a sort of patronising that was held to be for "their" benefit, at the time.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment