Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
Wait until they take that hack Judge Cannon off this case.
View 2 more replies »
KunsanVeteran · M
@whowasthatmaskedman They should “detain” known sympathizers, Trump enablers, etc. who were involved the first time. A partial list follows: Gym Jordan, Pillow Addict, Rudy The Red Nosed, Donnie Jr, Michael Flynn, Ronny “Candyman” Jackson, Lindsey, Lake, Abbott, Cotton, Gosar, Cruz, Rick Scott, MTG, Boebert GED ThreePeat, Hannity, Clarence & Ginni Thomas, the Alitoes, Cannon, Powell, Alina Habba, Gaetz, George Santos, the Proud Boys, KKK, White Nationalists, etc.
Feel free to nominate others!
Feel free to nominate others!
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, MVIP
@KunsanVeteran Actually I disagree. I cant see one on your list who would be out front on the day carrying a weapon. They will all be like Little Donny was last time, In front of a TV watching. But tap their phones and email for sure, so they can be sorted quickly later..
And in the light of full disclosure, I have to say that I would adopt the same approach as Truman did with the A Bomb. Deploy maximum force to break the back of the troublemakers to save the lives of those in the cause of the law. A couple of passes with A10s and napalm should do it.. The innocent shouldnt be anywhere near there..
However. I would add Roger Stone to your list. He has been too quiet lately..😷
And in the light of full disclosure, I have to say that I would adopt the same approach as Truman did with the A Bomb. Deploy maximum force to break the back of the troublemakers to save the lives of those in the cause of the law. A couple of passes with A10s and napalm should do it.. The innocent shouldnt be anywhere near there..
However. I would add Roger Stone to your list. He has been too quiet lately..😷
@KunsanVeteran respectfully yes the policy on this is clear, they don’t bring new cases within the specific timeline around an election, and the policy does not apply to ongoing and/or delayed cases. However, a jab at Garland is counterproductive and unnecessary.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, MVIP
He must have a very long roll of paper..😷
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Elisbch · M
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
I doubt if there is enough time in court for them ALL.
Nanoose · 70-79, M
This is kind of like the age old question – If God is the all mighty could he create a rock that is so heavy that even he couldn’t lift it?
So if Smith is the all mighty of prosecutors can he expose all of Trump’s crimes. I think he can because he will have the help of something God wouldn’t have – Trump’s big mouth. Trump often opens up his mouth and exposes himself. Cheers!
So if Smith is the all mighty of prosecutors can he expose all of Trump’s crimes. I think he can because he will have the help of something God wouldn’t have – Trump’s big mouth. Trump often opens up his mouth and exposes himself. Cheers!
KunsanVeteran · M
@Nanoose Excellent reasoning!
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, MVIP
@Nanoose But when is a crime not a crime? When the statute of limitations expires on it? When money is taken and an NDA signed to suppress the evidence? Or when a rent a mob makes the witnesses or victims lives so intolerable that they disappear? In Trumps case, all of the above.😷
SomeMichGuy · M
I guess he's discovered the Fountain of Youth...
softspokenman · M
He may be referring to just the crimes committed on J6 and not every crime 'Mr. Twitchit' has ever committed.
bijouxbroussard · F
All that he’s aware of should be pretty substantial.
















