Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Socialism Works 2: Evo Morales

Evo Morales' first term in office (2006-2010), was the most far-reaching in terms of structural changes, it is worth highlighting the fulfillment of the so-called "October Agenda," with two fundamental measures standing out: a) the nationalization of the natural gas industry, which was accomplished with much symbolism on May 1, 2006 and b) the constituent assembly, which after a rocky road led to the adoption by referendum (January 2009) of a new political constitution within a state now conceived as plurinational.

With the nationalizations of the natural gas industry and other strategically important companies, such as in the telecommunications sector (Entel), which coincided with a boom period due to the rise in international commodity prices, the Bolivian state overcame its beg-thy-neighbor status (the so-called "state with holes") and progress was made toward becoming a strong state with a comprehensive territorial presence. Thus, public investment became the main source of a model for growth, economic stability, and top-down redistribution that was praised by all international organizations.
Moreover, despite numerous difficulties and delays, important steps were taken to achieve the longed-for industrialization of the natural gas sector and other major undertakings (power generation, iron production, exploitation of lithium reserves).

The new constitution, in turn, brought progress and fundamental achievements within the framework of the new, plurinational state model with self-government. The constitutional recognition of the subject "indígena originario campesino" (roughly: people of indigenous and peasant descent) and its inclusion in state structures and in the public-political sphere can also be counted among the significant successes. The plurinationality of the state is an achievement under construction, as is the progress made on the long road to greater territorial self-government, including the possibility of autonomy for indigenous communities.

In addition, of course, the reduction of social inequality and especially economic poverty must not be forgotten. According to official figures, during Evo Morales' term in office, poverty fell from 59.9 percent to 34.6 percent, while extreme poverty dropped from 38.2 percent to 15.2 percent, due in part to various social benefits (bonos) for vulnerable segments of the population (Renta Dignidad for the elderly, Bono Juancito Pinto for school-age children, Bono Juana Azurduy for pregnant women).
Numerous studies by international organizations, such as those by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), also highlight as an achievement that during Evo Morales' reign the middle class has grown from 3.3 million (2005) to about seven million (2018) people.

Also important to mention is the development made due to the new constitutional and regulatory framework in gender equality, equal opportunities for women and men, and especially gender parity at the different legislative levels (national parliament, state parliaments, municipal councils), made possible by the permanent mobilization of diverse women's movements.
Other obvious successes include the reduction of social inequalities, the drastic reduction in illiteracy, good macroeconomic indicators, the halving of the unemployment rate (from 8.1 to 4.2 percent), the steady increase in the minimum wage, the increase in general life expectancy, and significant public investment in the country's infrastructure (especially in trunk and rural roads in countless construction projects, especially in rural areas).

Finally, there are those successes that cannot be measured by indicators, namely the restoration of Bolivia's dignity and sovereignty in the international context.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M Best Comment
They did great work and thanks for posting.

Latin American social democrats have.dine great work in brutally difficult circumstances. They have to face an alliance of the domestic right, the properties classes, the US govt and the CIA
Spotpot · 41-45, M
@Burnley123 Todays US leadship is very friendly with leftist southamerican countries seen by the ending on sanctions on Venezuela and attempts to end the embargo against Cuba.

MarkPaul · 26-30, M
This is largely a fabrication of those wanting to promote the idea of socialism. Bolivia's economy is virtually on the edge of collapse. The only thing propping it up right now, is they are transitioning to using the yuan to pay for exports and imports. And, despite their leftist rhetoric, this is mainly because their economy can't afford dollars.

Any investment in social programs will bring welcome relief to the masses, but as is the case with most socialist models, those short-term benefits will not last as pay-offs and political insider deals sink the economy. As with many things these days, your glowing report is only intended to score some points for your side of thinking. Particularly with those who literally reside on the Internet, it seems to be all that matters. No offense.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy Look, I believe in logic and good hard reasoning. I am not condescending or hysterical. And, I don't like you mischaracterizing me. My point is not "If you were a capitalist." It is if the report you made was from a capitalist oriented government you would question it and tear it apart. Since it largely comes from a socialist-leaning entity you accept it at face value. What can't you understand? How much more do I need to dumb this down?
Gloomy · F
@MarkPaul alright you didn’t understand my correction of your initial misunderstanding fine you don't get it.

and again no I think Sweden and Finlands anti homeless initiatives are great. Your condescending nature and just plain disingenuous arguing leaves me no choice but to say bye!
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy Okay.
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
Socialism works when certain countries don't kneecap it.
Gloomy · F
@Crazywaterspring Capitalist countries sanction Socialist states economies, support coups and antagonize and demonize them in general then point fingers and try to tell us how horrible Socialism is and how it always fails.
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
@Gloomy the worst thing a country can do is change their own government to a regime to one Washington does not approve of. Cuba, Lebanon, Venezuela and Iran are examples. Sanctions make life tougher for ordinary citizens.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
I'm often a little hesitant about a lot of national leaders no matter how socialist their credentials but Morales gets more checkmarks from me than almost anyone else.

Also it's vital to underline he's Indigenous and brings the voice of Bolivia's Indigenous peoples. The country is majority Indigenous but is used to white colonial leaders. Hugely important.
Gloomy · F
@CountScrofula Morales is just a great leader through and through.
Him being indigenous and how much of an impact this had on the country is huge and the US accusing him of being a dictator is ridiculous.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@Gloomy Funny how the US's conception of dictator is entirely based upon willingness to be financially exploited by US companies.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
Bolivia's major contribution to life was and still is about 50% of the investables on wall street, with true believers in high places, and crack heads like hunter helping advance the cause of corruption from Ukraine to a huge number of those 50 million or so "refined subjects" of that scandal ridden royal family, over 50% of the "well educated" lobbyists in DC., and every talking head in the lamestream media that has a memory like an octopus.

And thinks everyone is, forgetful as they.
Gloomy · F
@SteelHands like always you fail to make any sense and just throw in buzzwords like Hunter Biden
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
originnone · 61-69, M
sorry, Gloomy....I can't even read today....

 
Post Comment