Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

GOP Lawmaker Manages To Blame Abortion For Mass Shootings

GOP Lawmaker Manages To Blame Abortion For Mass Shootings
"Life has no value to a lot of these folks," Rep. Billy Long of Missouri said.

The GOP’s Outrageous Gun ‘Solutions’

There’s a new contender for most absurd GOP scapegoat for gun violence.

Rep. Billy Long (R-Mo.) was asked during an interview with Missouri radio station The Eagle 93.9 on Wednesday whether there was any appetite among Republicans in Congress to pursue changes to gun laws. It came in the wake of a gunman’s massacre of 19 children and two teachers in Uvalde, Texas.

Long, who is running for the U.S. Senate, said guns aren’t the issue. He criticized proponents of gun control for “trying to blame an inanimate object for all of these tragedies.”


He said there are a few solutions but that the problem can be traced back to when abortion became legal nationwide.

“When I was growing up in Springfield, you had one or two murders a year,” he said. “Now we have two, three, four a week in Springfield, Missouri.

“So something has happened to our society. I go back to abortion, when we decided it was OK to murder kids in their mothers’ wombs. Life has no value to a lot of these folks.”

The data doesn’t support that claim. The Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973 established abortion rights in the U.S.

In 1970, 499 murders were reported in Missouri. in 1975, the figure was 505. And in 2019, 568 murders were reported in the state.


The data does show, however, that the gun problem in America is linked to the proliferation of guns and the ease at which people can obtain them. Other countries have had great success in curbing gun violence by tightening gun laws or banning guns and implementing gun buyback programs.

Semiautomatic assault rifles, the guns frequently used in mass shootings like the one last week in Uvalde, are also shown to be part of the problem. In 1994, sweeping legislation was passed that banned certain assault weapons. It expired in 2004. Mass shooting deaths were 70% less likely during the ban, one study found.

“If there was something that would work that would prevent some of these things, any reasonable person is going to look at anything like that,” Long said.

“But to this day and time, no one has been able to come up with any kind of a suggestion that would have helped in any of these situations.”

He proposed retrofitting schools with additional doors so that all classrooms had both entry and exit points. Classrooms without extra doors are just “killing zones,” he said. He suggested the money spent on foreign aid to Ukraine could have been used to do this.

Elected Republicans, many of whom receive significant campaign support from the gun lobby, have blamed just about everything but guns in the wake of a recent spate of mass shootings. The supposed culprits include “wokeness,” architecture and a departure from worshipping Jesus.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), for example, thinks the issue is schools have too many doors.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/billy-long-abortion-gun-violence_n_62980d7ae4b0c184bdcce47f
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
spjennifer · 61-69, T
Fascinating isn't it:

Buffalo New York: White supremacist lunatic uses an AR15 style gun to kill 10 African Americans.

Uvalde Texass: Mexican American uses AR15 style gun to kill 19 children and 2 adults.

Tulsa, Oklahoma: African American (not confirmed) uses AR15 style gun to kill 4 people

What is the only common denominator in all 3 shootings and many more???
@spjennifer Now now! But are the precious guns okay?

SMH
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@spjennifer Laws don't work, enforcement of laws does work
@sunsporter1649 So then why do we have any laws at all if they don't work?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Spunkylama Tell that to judges handing down sentences like this.

Antifa Terrorist Convicted On FOUR Counts Of Attempted Manslaughter; Won’t Serve Any Time In Prison
@sunsporter1649 We talked about that yesterday. Are you still upset over it? Maybe write a letter to the judge.

You failed to explain your comment. You said laws don't work. I asked why we had any at all if they don't work. Have you no answer?
spjennifer · 61-69, T
@sunsporter1649 The "Laws" have to be enacted before they can be "enforced" silly 🤪💩🦆
spjennifer · 61-69, T
@Spunkylama Ole sundowner never has any answers, he's just a senile ole coot howling at the moon most days, don't expect any answers or common sense from him, he'll probably answer you with a Branco cartoon! 🤪
@spjennifer I see..I was trying to give everyone a chance since I am new and don't know anyone.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@spjennifer You mean the over 13,000 Federal, state, and local firearm laws have not been enacted!!! Whouda thunk it!!!
spjennifer · 61-69, T
@sunsporter1649 Where the heck are you getting those numbers from ole sundowner? The NRA? 13,000/50 States means there are an average of 260 firearms laws per State, when most of the red States have single digit numbers of laws? California and Massachusetts have the most at around 100 each. Your numbers don't wash ole sundowner, nowhere near that number, most States average about 15.5, nowhere near 260 per State... 🤪💩🦆
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@spjennifer "(CNSNews.com) - Why pass more gun laws, when there are 20,000 of them on the books that should be enforced? Many gun owners use that argument in the effort to stop gun-control groups from infringing on their Second Amendment rights.

But gun control advocates are trying to undermine that "20,000 gun laws" argument with a new study that casts doubt on the meaning of the "20,000" number.

A study from the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy counts only 300 "relevant federal and state laws regarding the manufacture, design, sale, purchase, or possession of guns." The key word is "relevant."

The study does not include a tally of local gun laws. In fact, the authors note that since more than 40 states preempt all or most local gun control laws, there's no reason to include local laws in a gun-law tally. It is "irrelevant" to count local laws that are superceded by state laws, the authors said in a press release heralding their study."

You do your counting wierd
spjennifer · 61-69, T
@sunsporter1649 No, I get my information from actual peer reviewed studies that have been conducted, not biased Right Wing news sources like CNS News:

https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/epdf/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303701

🤪💩🦆
spjennifer · 61-69, T
@Spunkylama Sorry, I am biased against him, he's a racist, quite senile and only regurgitates Right Wing nonsense and irrelevant cartoons, you can't have a sensible debate with him, ever 😖
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@spjennifer " It is "irrelevant" to count local laws that are superseded by state laws, the authors said in a press release heralding their study."

I see you can't read, either
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@spjennifer I am a racist, I watch all the races I can on television.

spjennifer · 61-69, T
@sunsporter1649 I'm quite certain that your very frequent use of the term "raghead terrorists" counts as a racist statement ole sundowner 😖💩🦆
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@spjennifer Muslims are just people, like most of the rest of us. raghead terrorists, however....
@sunsporter1649

raghead terrorists, however....

See...why don't you just call them terrorists? What does "raghead" add to "terrorist" except to also refer to an entire culture of people?

If indeed you're not a racist then stop using racist terms.
You don't need to include "raghead" when you're describing terrorists. Surely the label of terrorist is itself sufficiently condemnatory.

I know if we went back in your posts we'd never find you using that derogatory phrase to describe anyone but people who had themselves committed acts of terror...
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu You mean like antifa terrorists?
@sunsporter1649

Hmm, how quick you are to attempt to change the subject.
But i won't allow it.

I have no doubt that some people under that banner have committed acts that should be considered terrorism.
Sorry if you thought to redirect the conversation with that feeble gambit.

So let me put it to you again, and if you're a man, act like one and answer me head on:

Why don't you just call them terrorists? What does "raghead" add to "terrorist" except to also refer to an entire culture of people?
Will you cease to use this racist term? If not, how do you justify retaining it without a racist motivation?

Go ahead. Don't puss out this time, hmm?🙂
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu I am a racist, I watch all the races I can on television.

spjennifer · 61-69, T
@sunsporter1649 No, no, no, this time you call them Muslims because you're too much of a pussy to use the term you usually do. I've never seen you call someone a "Muslim" in 3+ years, you always call them "raghead terrorists" or some such derogatory term, so man up ole jarhead and just admit that you're a racist and always have been 😖💩🦆
@sunsporter1649

*yawn*
Yes, you've done that one already. It allows you to admit to being a racist and then pretend it's a joke...fooling nobody.
Strike two.

One wonders why you're so afraid to give a straight answer....

I'll give you one more chance to show us that you're actually not a racist.
See if you can meet me toe to toe this time, beta biiiiitch😁


Why don't you just call them terrorists? What does "raghead" add to "terrorist" except to also refer to an entire culture of people?
Will you cease to use this racist term? If not, how do you justify retaining it without a racist motivation?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu Typical left-wing nut job marxist bullschiff, anything you do not agree with is racist.

spjennifer · 61-69, T
@Spunkylama 👆 I rest my case 😖