The existence of the Secret Service is in conflict with the Second Amendment.
View 8 more replies »
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
MethDozer · M
@LeopoldBloom She's being hyperbolic to insinuate Trump is a tyrant
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@Reason10 The Secret Service protect tyranny. The Second Amendment is for fighting tyranny.
Ever wonder why people think right wingers are tyrannical authoritarians?
Ever wonder why people think right wingers are tyrannical authoritarians?
LeopoldBloom · M
What's interesting is that Secret Service protection for former presidents (or anyone else, like their families, former Senators, former Supreme Court Justices, etc.) is completely at the pleasure of the current president. Of course, no president has ever terminated protection for a former president.
Back when it looked like Trump might go to prison, the question arose as to how his Secret Service protection would work. One possibility would be for Biden to terminate it, because they do have guards in prisons and that would be adequate.
Back when it looked like Trump might go to prison, the question arose as to how his Secret Service protection would work. One possibility would be for Biden to terminate it, because they do have guards in prisons and that would be adequate.
MethDozer · M
@LeopoldBloom Imma have to check into that. As far as I knew they were given it as long as they wanted by a Congressional decision sometimes in the 1960s.
LeopoldBloom · M
@MethDozer By law, the President and Vice-President cannot refuse Secret Service protection. I think you're correct that former presidents are protected by law unless they decline it. I did read on electoral-vote.com that Biden would be able to revoke Trump's Secret Service detail if he's in prison and theoretically protected by the guards.
MethDozer · M
@LeopoldBloom ex presidents and VP can. I never said sitting P and VP
Northwest · M
Regardless of the who the person occupying the White House is, their actions on behalf of the United States of America, can, and often does, put a target on their backs.
The nation owes them protection for stepping up and accepting that role, on behalf of the people.
Nothing short of full protection is acceptable.
The alternative is for US Presidents to turn to corruption, and arrange for a tidy sum to be set aside. For instance, $2.5B USD from Saudi Arabia, so they can hire their own protective service when they leave office.
Other ex Presidents have never stooped this low, but it's about the principle.
Turns out security for Trump was upped significantly due to what we know is an Iranian plot to assassinate him (a couple of weeks prior to the 20 year old Incel's actions).
The nation owes them protection for stepping up and accepting that role, on behalf of the people.
Nothing short of full protection is acceptable.
The alternative is for US Presidents to turn to corruption, and arrange for a tidy sum to be set aside. For instance, $2.5B USD from Saudi Arabia, so they can hire their own protective service when they leave office.
Other ex Presidents have never stooped this low, but it's about the principle.
Turns out security for Trump was upped significantly due to what we know is an Iranian plot to assassinate him (a couple of weeks prior to the 20 year old Incel's actions).
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BittersweetPotato · 31-35, F
This is funny because it came up while I was watching an interview where they were bashing the secret services non stop for not doing a good job and suggesting that they did it on purpose too lol.
HellsBelle · F
good point but that is the LAST place we need to look at as far as wasted tax dollars
Captainjackass · 31-35, M
It’s ridiculous how much they put up with. The douche they protect makes them pay to stay for all his golfing and has made millions from it.
caccoon · 36-40
We have enough old white men anyway
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment










