The Boots theory of socio-economic unfairness
A decent pair of boots costs £100. An inferior pair costs £50.
The man who can afford the £100 pair has less need of them than the man who can only afford the £50 pair (he has a white collar job and his own private transport). They last the wealthier man a lifetime. The poorer man has to replace his inferior boots three times in his lifetime, meaning that an economically disadvantaged person has paid twice as much for the same level of utility.
This is an inefficient distribution of goods by the market, which impacts negatively on a society's economic productivity. How to overcome this? Price control of essential goods? Redistribution of wealth through tax credits or similar? State control of boot production?
The man who can afford the £100 pair has less need of them than the man who can only afford the £50 pair (he has a white collar job and his own private transport). They last the wealthier man a lifetime. The poorer man has to replace his inferior boots three times in his lifetime, meaning that an economically disadvantaged person has paid twice as much for the same level of utility.
This is an inefficient distribution of goods by the market, which impacts negatively on a society's economic productivity. How to overcome this? Price control of essential goods? Redistribution of wealth through tax credits or similar? State control of boot production?
36-40, F
