Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I don't like wealth inequality. I think Capitalism creates wealth inequality.

Not only that Capitalism has broken down the family nucleus. The system will collapse because of the socio conditions it creates.
Top | New | Old
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
People deserve different level of wealth. You deserve an outcome based off what you contribute. I mean we dont all get to date supermodels. We do not all get to drive Lambos. We do not all get ocean side houses. That is okay with me. Life has many components and financial is just one of those. Capitalism brings innovation and efficiency. Those are noble goals. Also it brings accountability and freedom.
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
@BohoBabe Okay now the fear and panic over AI. No invention has ever ruined society short of military stuff. AI will do amazingly positive things. Adjustments will have to be made. The freak out is just that a freak out. Medical advancements, traffic flow recognition, criminal recognition. Hopefully government fraud recognition. I am team AI 100%. I am team data center 100%. What politicians should be doing is building nuclear plants and doing everything possible to make us MORE ENERGY DOMINATE!
BohoBabe · M
@texasgamblerguy Nothing can ruin society, but things can make society worse. Pollution hasn't "ruined society" but it's still a problem. Same with AI.
@texasgamblerguy Nice propaganda talking point. Too bad it has no basis in reality.
The New Deal was very effective.
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
Drugs and moral decline and many things have broken down the family. Capitalism gives me people freedom and opportunity which can lead them to not have families. I happen to be a single person. I am pretty sure birth rates are really low in the large none capitalist countries. Birth rates are low in the countries you would call thriving socialism. As the world has become a more fun place to live, the desire to have kids goes down.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
We need full on meritocracy
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
No such thing as full on meritocracy. However greater and greater meritocracy should be strived for.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@texasgamblerguy no work no pay
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
Well duh, but why do you have wealth inequality? I care much more about how the poor live than contrasting it to the rich. Global poverty and starvation has plummeted the past 10-20-50-100 years. Who cares if the world has tons of wealthy. I only care that we have less suffering. Under that metric capitalism has done an amazing job over the past 100 years. The jealous view of comparison is the totally wrong approach.
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
I assume you have a job? I assume you are not the lowest paid worker in America? Do you feel bad that other people get paid less than you? Or might you have done things in your life that you deserve to have the job that you do that pays more than other jobs?
HenrySpanx · 46-50, M
Capitalism doesn't provide inequality. A lack of drive and motivation to improve your life does. Making excuses is what keeps people down. If you want a better life go get it. Quit blaming everything and everyone for not being where you want to be. You know who hates Capitalism?? Poor people
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
@HenrySpanx No capitalism does drive inequality 100%. It is okay to have inequality. The goal should be opportunity and mitigation of human suffering. Not guarantees to great lives, guarantees to not horrible lives is fine with me. The problem is the socialist have a never ending desire on what the guarantees should be. Once you guarantee a certain level it sucks the motivation out of many people.
HenrySpanx · 46-50, M
@texasgamblerguy explain how capitalism drives inequality? Some of the richest people in the world didn't start out that way. Opportunity is there for everyone.
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
@HenrySpanx We are not talking about inequality of opportunity which you would not deny exist. We are talking about outcomes. Capitalism does lead to disparate outcomes under any measure. I am not against disparate outcomes. I think every facet of our lives has disparate outcomes based on what we do and luck that happens upon us. I celebrate success.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
No. It doesnt. Not by itself. But sadly the people behind Capitalism usually want to manipulate the system to get richer. And THAT creates wealth inequality..😷
IsawDDevil · 36-40, M
@whowasthatmaskedman When economic models pushes liberal ideas. it is about economics.
texasgamblerguy · 46-50, M
@whowasthatmaskedman What is not moral is 39 trillion in debt. Both parties get Fs for that 39 trillion debt and also our illogical immigration policy over the past 40 years.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@texasgamblerguy I couldnt agree with you more. Throughout history, the fall of an empire has always beem preceded by it living beyond its means😷
BohoBabe · M

 
Post Comment