This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Likely because of a records verification issue. USA companies must report what they sold directly to the IRS. There's little way foreign countries can verify by USA standards. The ruling as well can only apply to USA companies since our courts only apply to the USA.
It will be interesting if Congress itself makes any laws on a international basis. The courts would have to rule in favor internationally since its a actual congregational law. These tariffs are by executive orders. No court can rule solely on executive orders internationallly. Yet congressional laws a court can.
It will be interesting if Congress itself makes any laws on a international basis. The courts would have to rule in favor internationally since its a actual congregational law. These tariffs are by executive orders. No court can rule solely on executive orders internationallly. Yet congressional laws a court can.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer Your statements are rated as untrue on many (perhaps all) levels. You have been placed in the Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. bin of most non-factual statements in a single message.
Any company can apply for the refund of illegal tariffs, but only qualified ones will be able to collect. And one of the qualifications is that the company needed to pay one of the illegal tariffs. No country or foreign company (not "residing" inside the USA) paid those tariffs, so none are qualified.
As in the EU, the USA judicial system can make rulings that apply to companies outside their geographic boundaries. Since Google does business in the EU, the EU can direct American companies through rulings. Since Tik Tok did business in the USA before taking on American ownership, it was subject to USA rules imposed by USA courts.
Any company can apply for the refund of illegal tariffs, but only qualified ones will be able to collect. And one of the qualifications is that the company needed to pay one of the illegal tariffs. No country or foreign company (not "residing" inside the USA) paid those tariffs, so none are qualified.
As in the EU, the USA judicial system can make rulings that apply to companies outside their geographic boundaries. Since Google does business in the EU, the EU can direct American companies through rulings. Since Tik Tok did business in the USA before taking on American ownership, it was subject to USA rules imposed by USA courts.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul Ok know it all, why do you even ask?
Obviously what your saying doesn't apply!
Because it's happening just how I am saying.
The actions match the reasoning.
Your own reasoning doesn't match the actions.
Obviously what your saying doesn't apply!
Because it's happening just how I am saying.
The actions match the reasoning.
Your own reasoning doesn't match the actions.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer That makes no sense... if you review the facts and are able to find the exit to your fantasy. Only American companies are applying for the tariff refund because they are the only ones who have paid the illegal tariffs. That is not what you are saying. What you are saying is not what is happening.
This isn't about reasoning; it's about reporting the facts. I am asking the question to help guide your (critical) thinking. And to be precise, the question is NOT what is happening. It establishes a factual premise and asks, "isn't it curious..." Do better. Your final grade will depend on it.
This isn't about reasoning; it's about reporting the facts. I am asking the question to help guide your (critical) thinking. And to be precise, the question is NOT what is happening. It establishes a factual premise and asks, "isn't it curious..." Do better. Your final grade will depend on it.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul And I'm giving you a perfectly logical critical thinking method.
For every action, there's a reaction.
For every action, there's a reaction.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul please!
You asked I gave you a reasoning.
Once again, action -> reaction.
If you know the reason, don't ask.
You asked I gave you a reasoning.
Once again, action -> reaction.
If you know the reason, don't ask.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer
1. I didn't ask for a reasoning. I asked for confirmation that "it's curious..." OFF TOPIC
2. Your so-called "reasoning" negates the facts of the issue. NOT FACTUAL
3. If you fantasize an action (foreign companies and companies are paying USA tariffs), then your identified reaction will be false. NONSENSICAL
You final grade: D-
1. I didn't ask for a reasoning. I asked for confirmation that "it's curious..." OFF TOPIC
2. Your so-called "reasoning" negates the facts of the issue. NOT FACTUAL
3. If you fantasize an action (foreign companies and companies are paying USA tariffs), then your identified reaction will be false. NONSENSICAL
You final grade: D-
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul 1 you did ask! "isn't it curious that all of those refunds are going to American companies?"
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer That's the premise based on a factual accounting. You bypassed the facts and created your own storyline. That's not allowed... not on my watch.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul Guy I won't go down the insult route. Yet you are asking for no one to reply doing what you are doing.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer You can't just make up sh*t and expect people to just accept it. You are literally asking for people to block you.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer I want the truth!
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul You want YOUR OWN TRUTH!
You said on a previous post that you think you're blocked. Why even say that if you want others to even reply?
I hardly post at all. It's been weeks since I even posted. Over two months in fact.
If I cared, I would post!
You said on a previous post that you think you're blocked. Why even say that if you want others to even reply?
I hardly post at all. It's been weeks since I even posted. Over two months in fact.
If I cared, I would post!
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer I just think I am the most blocked person by the greatest number of people than anyone else. You said that was probably not the case and I accepted your reasoning and intuition. So, now when you get questioned, you get all bent out of shape.
I hardly post too.
I hardly post too.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul guy you post everyday sometimes several times a day.
As I said on your other post about blocks. I get blocked because I seek out posts on the forums. Often on conservative posts!
That's why I am blocked more than you. I don't rely on a limited feed.
As I said on your other post about blocks. I get blocked because I seek out posts on the forums. Often on conservative posts!
That's why I am blocked more than you. I don't rely on a limited feed.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DeWayfarer Well, I post in more than a limited feed.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@MarkPaul You think I don't know it? 🤣
The forums have every post on this site! The feed's don't! It's based on what YOU would think is popular to YOU!
The forums have every post on this site! The feed's don't! It's based on what YOU would think is popular to YOU!



