Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Dire consequences for NY: Twisted judge gives NYPD cop 3-9 years for doing his job, killer gets only months

A Bronx courtroom just delivered a gut punch to every cop in New York — and a warning to every law-abiding citizen.

In a ruling that will echo far beyond the borough, Judge Guy Mitchell slammed NYPD Sgt. Erik Duran with a staggering 3-to-9-year prison sentence. His “crime”? Doing his job.

The message couldn’t be clearer: hesitate, stand down — or risk prison.

Duran was convicted of manslaughter after throwing a drink cooler at fleeing suspect Eric Duprey, who crashed and later died. A tragic outcome, yes — but a far cry from the kind of violent intent that usually lands someone behind bars for nearly a decade.

“Today will be forever remembered as one of the darkest days in the history of our profession,” said Sergeants Benevolent Association President Vincent Vallelong. Even former NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly blasted the ruling as “a huge miscarriage of justice.”

They’re right.

If anything, the case screamed for leniency — not a hammer. Mitchell had the discretion to reduce the charge to criminally negligent homicide, which could’ve meant probation. Instead, he chose to make an example out of a 15-year veteran with no prior record. Why? The judge claimed the sentence would act as a “general deterrent.” Deterrent to what — policing?

Duran was in the middle of a “buy-and-bust” operation, trying to stop a suspect speeding off on a scooter — a potential threat to officers and civilians alike. According to his sworn testimony, he acted to protect fellow cops in harm’s way.

Yet the court twisted that into motive, suggesting he acted just to avoid losing an arrest. So what’s the new rule — let suspects flee? Let chaos reign?

This wasn’t justice. It was a warning shot — aimed squarely at every officer in uniform. And the double standard is glaring.

Top | New | Old
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
After reading the details, this sounds like a proper judgement. Lethal force is not warranted against someone fleeing a drug bust. I don't see what they mean by a double standard here. Police should be held to very high standards. They are trusted with significant authority and should carry commensurate responsibility.

Police in the US have enjoyed too much leniency for the oppressive violence that has become far too common. There were probably better cases to use to send the signal that police need to exercise more restraint. But the message did need to be sent.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ViciDraco Yup, who cares how many folks get killed by drugs, it's just another way for drug dealers to supplement income from their day job at the child care center, right?
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 the war on drugs has been failing for half a century. Maybe time to try a different approach.

 
Post Comment