Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Republicans Warn Passing Voter ID Law Could Ruin Plan To Hand Congress To Democrats In November

With the 2026 midterm elections on the horizon amid increasing strife over problems facing the nation, Republican lawmakers issued an urgent warning that passing a national voter ID law could ruin their plan to hand Congress to the Democrats in November.

While President Trump and his administration continued to apply pressure to congressional GOP leaders and stress the importance of passing voter ID legislation, Republicans expressed concern that such a move could potentially spell doom for their goal of losing both the House and the Senate to Democrats this fall.

"There's a real danger that this could keep us in power," House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Capitol Hill. "We've put a lot of effort into laying the groundwork to hand the Democrats full control of the legislative branch in November, and passing a law that would require voters to show a valid ID could completely derail those plans. We know the president has very strong feelings on the topic, but we're doing our best to avoid making any moves that could prevent us from losing both chambers of Congress."

Johnson's GOP colleagues agreed that now was not the time to bolster election integrity. "We can't worry about this right now," said Senate Majority Leader John Thune. "It would be best to wait until we lose the House and Senate to the Democrats, when we could all use passing a voter ID law as a campaign platform to convince people to vote us back into power in 2028 so we can go back to not really doing anything."

At publishing time, Republican leadership had also warned the White House that continuing to deport illegal aliens could negatively impact Democrats' vote totals.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
Isn't it common sense that ID is required to vote?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JohnnySpot Then shouldn't it also be common sense, that the governement makes sure every citizen gets ID so that they can excercise one of the most important rights without having to jump through any hoop?
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@Kwek00 The talons of the eagle were not designed to cuddle.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JohnnySpot Are you saying that the USA was not designed to protect the rights of their citizens?
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@Kwek00 if you don't have an ID come to vote and register there. Would you like a wake up call? How about a ride to the poll? It's your responsibility to take initiative for your own life.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JohnnySpot Why not make people come to the institution that gives out legit ID at the age that they are allowed to vote. Make sure they are all set up for their civil rights. Most European countries, don't have this discussion (none, for as far as I'm aware).

My girlfriends friend moved from Athens Georgia to Austin Texas. So she applied for a new ID, 7 months in advance of the 2024 elections. She got a letter, that her ID would be ready, AFTER the presidential election of 2024. That's the practise we are dealing with.

And this discussion only pops up with Republicans... the same republicans, that boasts that Voter ID is keeping people from voting which apperently is a good thing for them.
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@Kwek00 You have to have ID to vote otherwise people could vote multiple times...
It's been a problem for over a century.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JohnnySpot Well yeah, because the republican party is making it into an issue. 🤷‍♂ They complain about it a lot, but are apperently really bad at proofing WHY it is actually an issue.

But when they get interviewed, it sometimes slips out that the purpose is purely to restrict certain segments of the population from voting.

And again, I have no issues with VoterID, I think the US is extremely backwards when it comes to ID. But, when the governements tells you that you need something to vote, which is pretty much one of your most precious rights as a citizen, then the governement should provide. Right now, the discussion feels just like another itteration of voter suppresion, as it was during the time that Poll tax was used, or literacy tests were applies to keep people from voting.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 Evidence?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 I'll wait for that evidence... People have been waiting, as @JohnnySpot points out, for over a century.

It's been a problem for over a century
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 Oh... over a centurie of issues, and no evidence of significant problems... funny how that works, eh.
@JohnnySpot Depends on how voter ID is implemented.

I've got NO PROBLEM with the theory of voter ID, as long as it's free and easy. I DO have a problem with the practice of making it differentially harder for the elderly & working poor. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/challenge-obtaining-voter-identification

"Voter ID laws have been estimated by the U.S. Government Accountability Office to reduce voter turnout by 2-3 percentage points, translating to tens of thousands of votes lost in a single state." https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/block-the-vote-voter-suppression-in-2020/

Alabama is a case in point. A state shouldn't be allowed to do what Alabama did, passing voter ID laws and then closing ID issuing offices in predominantly poor or black counties.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues So? Registering is free and easy, just show up at the office and fill out the form, could not be easier. If you lack transportation, a phone call to any number of orginizations, and voila, transportation provided, could not be easier
@sunsporter1649 You mean pay for transportation to and from an office in a different county?? That's neither free nor easy, sunstroke.

Let's see what the non--partisan Government Accountability Office has to say:
Voter ID laws have been estimated by the U.S. Government Accountability Office to reduce voter turnout by 2-3 percentage points, translating to tens of thousands of votes lost in a single state.
https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/block-the-vote-voter-suppression-in-2020/

Two percentage points in an election with 156 million votes cast adds up to THREE MILLION lost votes!!!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues The democrat party club and the Republican party club here in my community provide free transportation to the voter registration office in my town. And if you do not prefer to use that free service, the city transportation service provides free transportation on city busses to qualifyed individuals
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649

2012 - Mike Turzai: "Voter ID which will allow governor Romney to win the state of Pensylvania, DONE!" - How Mike?

[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG7FQYKloO8]


2012 - Robert Gleason: "We cut Obama by 5%,[...], voter ID helped a bit in that." - How did it help Robert?

[media=https://youtu.be/eXF9euvxreE]


2016 - Glenn Grothman: "Voter ID is going to make a difference as well" ... How Glenn?

[media=https://youtu.be/5Kdm0Qa7aYY]





Todd Albaugh, after leaving the GOP tells why he left:

[media=https://youtu.be/t18P6XH9wJ0]
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 So that is why you so adamently support cleaning up voter registration roles, eh
@sunsporter1649 The example above is about Alabama, dude.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Show us the Congressional districts in Illinois
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 I'm not... I'm against voter supression. "cleaning up voter registration" is just another thing you don't care about, what you care about is making sure that the people you don't like cast their ballots.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 Judicial Watch has been deploying the NVRA for years in courts across the land, pressuring state governments to clean up their voter rolls. Recent developments in cases in Kentucky and New York put Judicial Watch past the five million milestone.

In Kentucky, state election board officials reported that “roughly 735,000 ineligible voter registrations” have been removed from voter rolls, as part of a 2018 consent decree settling a Judicial Watch lawsuit. “Since the consent decree was entered,” election officials notes, “a lot has changed. The State Board of Elections has worked overtime to comply with the consent decree and to clean up Kentucky’s voter rolls.”

A lot has changed in New York City too. As part of 2022 settlement with Judicial Watch, New York City began removing the names of ineligible voters from its voting rolls. Following the settlement, New York removed 440,000 ineligible names. New data for March 2023 to February 2025 show the removal of another 477,000 names—a total of more than 900,000 names.

Judicial Watch has notched victories in election integrity cases across America. In Los Angeles, county officials confirmed the removal of more than 1.2 million names from voter rolls as part of a settlement of a 2017 JW lawsuit. Judicial Watch legal pressure also resulted in election roll clean-ups in Pennsylvania, Colorado, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Ohio.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 Oh no... not Judicial Watch. If you just look into all the controversies about lying that they were in over the years, you kinda wonder why a sane person would ever use them as a source. But you and the guys from Judicial Watch probably crack open a blue ribbon at the crossburning from time to time.
@sunsporter1649 You and Judicial Watch do a great job of fear-mongering.

However, the data shows that voter fraud is VERY VERY rare in the US. The data also shows that current implementations of voter ID cost of around 2,000,000 losst votes in a major presidential year.

Heritage Foundation found 1,620 cases of voter fraud over a 40 year period; see below. Let's make best case assumptions by overestimating the rate of fraud per major national election; let's assume that ALL of those 1620 cases happened in the 10 presidential years inside that span. Thus, 162 cases per election that could presumably be blocked by voter fraud.

Best case: voter ID might catch 162 bad votes per major election. That's the benefit.

So the cost benefit analysis tells us that it costs about 2,000,000 legitimate votes to catch 162 fraudulent votes. That's a cost of 12,345 legit votes lost per fraudulent vote caught.

Regardless of your fear-mongering, sunstroke, that cost is WAY WAY too high!!!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Kwek00

Tell us again howthe 87,000 armed irs agents are going after the rich.
Tell us again how russia interfered with the US elektions.
Tell us again how biden has the kung flu under control.
Tell us again how biden knows nothing about hunters business dealings.
Tell us again how the troops will not leave Afghanastan until all American citizens have left.
Tell us again how biden is gonna cut the deficit.
Tell us again how hunters laptop is ruskie disinformation.
Tell us again how the southern border is secure.
Tell us again how people making under $400,000 a year will not have their taxes raised.
Tell us again that if you get the jab you will not get the kung flu.
Tell us again how girls are really boys.
Tell us again how biden claimed leveraged “powerful punishments” that brought Putin to his knees.
Tell us again how gas prices are going down.
Tell us again how bidens build back better will lower your costs and lower the deficit.
Tell us again how murdering babies in the womb is health care.
Tell us again how jan. 6 was an “armed insurrection” in which five people were killed.
Tell us again when President Trump referred to Nazis and White supremacists as “very fine people".
Tell us again how Police are Nazis, enforcing a “systemically white supremacist America.”
Tell us again how the blm/antifa protests were “mostly peaceful.”
Tell us again how hydroxychloroquine is not only useless against COVID-19, but extremely dangerous.
Tell us again how there are no American troops in Ukraine.