Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

California puts new tax on rechargeable batteries – including smart phones



Photo above - toxic danger alert! Lithium! Everything you see above, plus smart phones, watches, laptops, and tablets is an existential threat. To save the planet California will now tax them an extra 1.5%.

I can just imagine how the debate went in the California legislature. “Voters will go nuts if we raise taxes again. Income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, gasoline taxes, electric taxes, alcohol, wealth. What are we gonna do?”

A hand is raised in the back row. “We already tax smart phones when they’re first sold. Why not a new tax on the battery INSIDE the cell phone? just the battery. We can still keep applying the sales tax to the phone, as well.”

This is an imaginary legislative debate of course. But it’s exactly what happened. If you have a NON-removable battery in anything you buy, it now gets its own extra 1.5% tax. Cell phones. Smart watches. Laptops. Tablets. Wireless headphones. Google goggles. LED flashlights. Laser Pointers. Many home security cams. Desk fans . . . but rechargeable vapes are EXLUDED. Stop laughing. This is really true. See link below.

Okay . . . the list of what IS covered seems to be endless. Millions of people are going to go WTH!!!! as they make ordinary purchases in 2026.

California has come full circle now. From twisting everyone’s arm to go all-electric, and especially to buy EV cars, to taxing even the tiniest rechargeable batteries imaginable. Cognitive dissonance.

How much money will the state think it will collect from this scheme? I went to 4 websites and got 4 different estimates. Either nobody actually knows, or they’re lying.

Taxing batteries with a surcharge and claiming it’s due to dangerous lithium has nothing to do with saving mother earth, of course. It’s simply a grab for resident’s wallets.

I’m just sayin’ . .

New Year, New Surcharge, California Slaps Fee On Battery Gadgets
Top | New | Old
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
The surcharge is an electronic waste fee on non-removable batteries to offset the environmental damage and public cost of dealing with fires in refuse facilities. A non-recyclable battery in a greetings card that goes straight to landfill should not be regarded as a "normal purchase", that's the whole point.

Shifting the economic burden of environmentally destructive practices from the general taxpayer to the polluter/consumer is exactly what a progressive tax regime should be doing.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@SunshineGirl yeah, i read the same press release. essentially it says lithium is too dangerous to own or recycle. it's hilarious.

why doesn't the fee apply to EVs?
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@SusanInFlorida Because EV batteries are removable and can be dealt with safely.

The motorway closest to where I live has been shut twice in the past three months by battery fires in refuse trucks. The cost to the public purse is immense.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@SunshineGirl if you remove the battery on an EV by yourself, you void the warranty. same as with a smartphone or laptop
AmericanAvenger · 56-60, M
That state is so poorly run now that I cant understood why anyone would want to stay there. I lived there through the 90s and it was not this bad
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@AmericanAvenger ocean views and easy drug access will always have market demand
trollslayer · 46-50, M
I’d be okay with a “deposit bottle” model, where you pay an extra flat fee and get a refund when you return it. But this *specifically* should apply to vapes…
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@trollslayer i think a cell phones should have batteries which are removable/replaceable by consumers.

the explanation that phones can't be bathtub resistant with removable batteries is complete BS. I'm using an electric toothbrush every day that is.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@SusanInFlorida I have TWO perfectly good laptops that are ruined because of this.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
democrats never met a tax they did not like
pdockal · 56-60, M

 
Post Comment