Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

China subsidizes its EV makers. Should the US do it too? (The lesson from Tesla)




Photo above - the 2025 Rivian R1S costs $106,000. Which may be why you see so few of them in the wild. Drivers' Ed 101 - please think twice about taking your Rivian EV on a road trip to Alaska - battery range is cut shockingly short by subzero temps.

How much economic advice should we take from a CEO whose company doesn't make money? The last time we did that, Tesla ended up scoring a $7,500 tax credit for each car sold, immediately propelling them from losses to profits. Are we happy with that decision now?

Today’s advice comes from R.J. Scaringe, CEO of EV maker Rivian. The company lost $1.2 billion in 2024, and $2 billion in 2023. They eked out a small profit in the first quarter of 2025. Before you cheer, let’s understand that Rivian only sold 52,000 vehicles in 2024, and expects to sell even less this year.

Some reader with a quick calculator may have already figured out that Rivian LOST $23,000 per vehicle last year. (Check my math). So, when Rivian wants to lecture us about “what’s wrong” with America’s EV industry, this should be taken with a grain of salt, no?

According Mr. Scaringe, China’s secret sauce is . . . government subsidies of their nation's EV cars. He doesn’t come right out and beg for US subsidies to Rivian, but what else could possibly be on his mind? Hey, Mr. Scaringe . . . we already installed umpteen thousands of public chargers at government expense. Because someone said "range anxiety" was the problem. Now you want us to hand even MORE money directly to your corporate treasurer?

Rivian Automotive Inc went public in 2021 at $128 a share. Those shares are down 90% today, at $13.XX. The investment community renders a new verdict on every corporation at the close of each trading day. Thowing tax money at corporations which chronically underperform is NOT going to rehabilitate the falling reputation of capitalism. No more subsides, whether that company is named Tesla, Rivian, Ford, or GM. (I'm not a fan of tariffs either). Automakers should live or die based on their product lineup and pricing. Otherwise they have no incentive to get it right.

Rivian CEO Scaringe really nails it halfway through his Business Insider magazine interview, though. He admits that Rivian – and every other EV company in America – will NEVER be able to compete with China because of wages/assembly cost. The average Chinese car assembly line worker makes 100,000 yuan ($12,000 USD) a year. That’s 10% of what America pays UAW workers – before pension benefits, healthcare, overtime, etc. There’s no way handing out free taxpayer money to Rivian or Ford or Chevrolet is EVER going to bridge that chasm.

In fact, if the government does give taxpayer dollars to EV manufacturers, they’re still going to lose money, and we’re simply subsidizing the salaries of those $140,000 a year union guys wielding screwdrivers and pliers.

Sorry Mr. Scaringe (and any other EV fanboy readers who want their toys subsidized) - if you want to compete with China, you’ll have to do it with automation and robots. Not with handouts to people already making double what the average US worker earns.

I’m just sayin’ . . .



Rivian CEO says Chinese EV makers aren't doing something 'magical' to achieve cheaper vehicles

Automotive Worker Salary in China (2025) - SalaryExpert

Rivian Releases First Quarter 2025 Financial Results - Newsroom - Rivian
Top | New | Old
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
I have a Rivian RS1 it is nice vehicle, it is not so bad actually good value at $106 000 for what you are getting packed into the vehicle as extra's. It is good car as a little runaround for carting little one around as it has tons of space and lots of useful extras like the built-in air compressor to inflate the inflatable toys for the beach or pool, has a Bluetooth speaker so you can take the music with you, their is a foldout electric stove that plugs into the car so you can cook, the frunk can be a big ice box to keep the champagne drinks and other things chilled, loads of cameras and sensors. Even one that tells you that the dog is comfortable. The cabin is spacious and can carry 7 .
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
An industry that is pushing the envelope with new technology is entitled to a temporary hand up from the government. Particularly if its an export earner..This is very much the case in China.😷
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
China has used that subsidy to mass produce small, affordable vehicles that are transforming the EV market not just in China but in nations they export to. Would America do the same, or would public subsidy be wasted in shareholder dividends?
@SunshineGirl Probably wasted, just like privatising the railways was a wasted opportunity here. All it did was put money into the pockets of shareholders rather than improving services.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@SunshineGirl i don't want government subsidies going to corporations. whether they make cars, kitty litter, or smartphones.

if we subsidize corporate america they have no incentive to make stuff we want at prices we can afford.
@SusanInFlorida What about government subsidies going to fossil fuel corporations?
GerOttman · 70-79, M
Didn't the US give tax credits on EVs? That seems like a subsidy to me, just at the other end.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@GerOttman tax credits are a bonanza for people who are rich enough to pay taxes, and want to drive a $100,000 EV toy. they do nothing for the rest of us. in fact, we (wage slaves) end up paying MORE taxes (and more interest on the national debt) to dish out those tax credits to the wealthy
wildland · M
The answer is yes. Yes, they should.
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
Hell no, look a Solara, may be Sylara or similar , a solar industry that bathhouse Barry loaned half a billion went bust in two years.
Owned by big democratic donors
wildland · M
@Patriot96 yeah, did you read my comment?
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@Patriot96 who is "bath house barry?"
wildland · M
@SusanInFlorida He means Obama.
Tariffs will result in other countries buying more of our stuff and them paying us for access to the world’s best buying market. We come out ahead both ways.
Possibly except same goes for the middlemen and the where else are they going to sell the stuff part. Also in some cases the making it here part which raises GNP resulting in higher income tax receipts. A lot of it comes down to the will of the US to change the dynamic which has resulted in the huge and getting huger deficit. I’m in favor of trying something new for awhile. It can’t be worse in the shorty term. @wishforthenight
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@jackjjackson i'm all for higher incomes, and taxes paid on those incomes instead of welfare or "pandemic stimulus" while stores and factories are locked by government order.

every part in my cell phone, laptop, and tv came from behind the iron curtain. (china) i don't see how we can waive the tariff wand and magically change that overnight.
Who else would they sell that stuff to if not us the world’s best buyers market? They and some middlemen have to eat way more than 75% of the tariffs. @SusanInFlorida
I’ve ridden in Chinese minivans in the Bahamas. A little tight.
@jackjjackson You can't go wrong with Bahamian food. Love me the conch salad too 😋
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@jackjjackson we don't import "kei" cars from japan, either. they don't pass the crash tests. every car in america needs to pass the crash test. whether it's made domestically, in germany, china, or zimbabwe.
I would hope not. The ones I was in didn’t need to exceed 30 MPH and even then didn’t seem all that safe. They must be cheap when sold in other countries. @SusanInFlorida
A company just bought a fleet of them cheap to use as Ubers in NYC. Pix way less than half that.

 
Post Comment