Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Democrats Declare Gerrymandering Bad Until They Need To Gerrymander Again

Congressional Democrats announced today that they are very much opposed to electoral gerrymandering up until the time when they will need to do it themselves, at which point they'll support it again.

"This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity," state legislatorGene Wu told reporters. "We strongly condemn these redistricting efforts until the time comes again when fellow democrats in other states need to gerrymander their own districts, and then at that point we will strongly support it."

Following Texas's new redistricting efforts, Democratic leaders in the state fled the legislative session in an attempt to delay and thwart what they believe to be a gross miscarriage of political power, at least until they can get away with it themselves, at which point they said they'll gladly support it.

"Sure, California, Illinois, and other deep blue states have been gerrymandering Republican voters out of power for decades, but this is bad because now Republicans are doing it, and we just hate it when they do stuff we've been doing forever," Wu said.

"NO CAP!" shouted Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett.

At publishing time, Texas Democrats announced that they will stay out of the state for as long as it takes to prevent the redistricting votes to take effect, or until they get bored and need to come home to water their plants.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JSul3 · 70-79
Trump decided that TX needed to gerrymander because "I'm entitled to it."

I thought you Trumpettes were against entitlements.


How about we end gerrymandering nation wide and have independent groups redraw the state maps?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@JSul3 The independant group commonly known as the democrat party, since they are experts at gerrymanding?
JSul3 · 70-79
@sunsporter1649 Got proof of that Sport?

Both parties have done it.

Now Trump says "I'm entitled to it."
So how he entitled?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
@BizSuitStacy You did not supply any details on when this 'gerrymandering' took place.

Please provide WHEN.

AND was this done after a census was done?

Trump says 'entitled'.....that's not democracy.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
JSul3 · 70-79
@BizSuitStacy
Red states with Zero Democrat seats:
AK, AR, ID, IA, MT, NE, OK, SD, UT, WVA.

IN has 2 Democrats.
SC and TN have 1 Democrat.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@JSul3

Alaska 1 seat
Arkansas 4 seats
Idaho 2 seats
Iowa 4 seats
Montana 2 seats
Nebraska 3 seats
Oklahoma 5 seats
South Dakota 1 seat
Utah 4 seats
West Virginia 2 seats


Indiana 2 of 9 seats

South Carolina 1 of 7 seats
Tennessee 1 of 7 seats


Win a few elections and you can gerrymand those seats
JSul3 · 70-79
@sunsporter1649 Would you support ending gerrymandering nation wide?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@JSul3 You want the districts frozen forever in all States?
JSul3 · 70-79
@sunsporter1649 No, because the populations shift. That's why we have a census every ten years.,..then districts are re-examined and changed as needed....but Fairly, with no bias towards political party or race/ethnicity.
I believe it can be done.