Trump Demands Investigation After Pelosi’s Stock Returns Beat Wall Street by Large Margin
At a White House press conference on Wednesday, Trump didn’t hold back. He went straight for the jugular about what he sees as blatant corruption at the highest levels. His target: Nancy Pelosi’s miraculous ability to beat professional investors year after year.
“You know, Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside information. She made a fortune with her husband, and I think that’s disgraceful,” Trump said during a press conference at the White House. “And what I do think is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated, because she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street, save a few.”
Let me get this straight. Paul Pelosi’s portfolio delivered 54% returns last year. The S&P 500? Just 25%. That’s not investing—that’s magic. Or maybe it’s something else entirely.
Look at these “coincidences.” Paul Pelosi sold 5,000 Microsoft shares. Months later? The FTC launches an antitrust investigation. He dumped Visa stock. Then the Justice Department files a monopoly lawsuit. He bought Nvidia options that turned $2.4 million into $7.2 million. Every. Single. Time.
Here’s the kicker—it’s not just tech stocks. The Pelosis bought call options in some random AI company called Tempus. Next thing you know, boom—$200 million deal announced. They invested in an energy company. Surprise! A $2 billion acquisition follows. The timing is perfect—every single time.
Even Democrats are starting to admit this stinks. Senator Josh Hawley introduced a bill to ban Congress members from trading stocks. And get this—it’s actually getting support from both sides.
Pelosi claims she supports these restrictions. She says she has “no concern” about their investments. Really? She insists her husband makes all the trades independently. Come on. Nobody’s buying it when the results beat every hedge fund on Wall Street.
This isn’t just about one politician getting rich. Think about what this means. The people who write our laws are making millions from knowing what’s coming before we do. You and I? We’re playing poker while they can see everyone’s cards.
Regular investors do research. They analyze data. They take risks. Political insiders? They just trade on what they know is coming. It’s like betting on a horse race when you already know who wins.
“You know, Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside information. She made a fortune with her husband, and I think that’s disgraceful,” Trump said during a press conference at the White House. “And what I do think is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated, because she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street, save a few.”
Let me get this straight. Paul Pelosi’s portfolio delivered 54% returns last year. The S&P 500? Just 25%. That’s not investing—that’s magic. Or maybe it’s something else entirely.
Look at these “coincidences.” Paul Pelosi sold 5,000 Microsoft shares. Months later? The FTC launches an antitrust investigation. He dumped Visa stock. Then the Justice Department files a monopoly lawsuit. He bought Nvidia options that turned $2.4 million into $7.2 million. Every. Single. Time.
Here’s the kicker—it’s not just tech stocks. The Pelosis bought call options in some random AI company called Tempus. Next thing you know, boom—$200 million deal announced. They invested in an energy company. Surprise! A $2 billion acquisition follows. The timing is perfect—every single time.
Even Democrats are starting to admit this stinks. Senator Josh Hawley introduced a bill to ban Congress members from trading stocks. And get this—it’s actually getting support from both sides.
Pelosi claims she supports these restrictions. She says she has “no concern” about their investments. Really? She insists her husband makes all the trades independently. Come on. Nobody’s buying it when the results beat every hedge fund on Wall Street.
This isn’t just about one politician getting rich. Think about what this means. The people who write our laws are making millions from knowing what’s coming before we do. You and I? We’re playing poker while they can see everyone’s cards.
Regular investors do research. They analyze data. They take risks. Political insiders? They just trade on what they know is coming. It’s like betting on a horse race when you already know who wins.
70-79, M
