@
BohemianBabe You can say someone is pretty without mentioning genetics. For instance when I look at someone I think gee they're pretty but I don't generally think in terms of eugenics philosophy and have a whole narrative like that which is what makes the ad so weird.
I got that it was word play the first time when I saw it but I also get that it was alluding to eugenics too.
Left needs to stop with the anti-white stuff that caused MAGA in the first place. This is just a gift to the Right.
It's really not. I'm really trying not to fight but it seems like people like to scapegoat the left a bit unfairly without objectivity. Here's why I think that.
First, there's the issue of no objectivity.
Maga takes terms way out of context. Could they be right sometimes? Yes but I find with just even the slight mention of any concepts, they tend not to consider anything anyways.
They take the things people say way out of context no matter how you say it, you could say it in the nicest way possible, it's not going to happen and they think that any social program is coming at them like some paranoia govt conspiracy.
That's why you can never raise the minimum wage and why we'll never have free transportation and abortion back so we're stuck at high infant and female mortality rates.
Maga was never objective to begin with, they're not able to say "you know what, I'm against abortion but I recognize the dangers of not having it and even though I have an issue, I'm willing to trust someone else's judgment, " nah it's very wishful thinking to think that maga would all of a sudden be objective if the left
never had its moments.
These people have something wrong with them that makes them drawn to maga in the first place, they need therapy or they'll latch onto another cult leader. For some reason, they're just really susceptible to this. And what they really need is help because there's a trauma reason why they latch onto these people. I'm not saying this out of disrespect, I really believe they need help.
Are they right about some extremism? Yes but there's a lot of theories that are in line with things like valid criticism that the Left puts out and maga never had the ability to understand that to begin with.
They don't seem to be able to grasp sociology in much the same way or recognize patterns in history and other things. I've had to explain biology and historical concepts to them many times. And many just don't care and don't see how their own actions affect others. They don't seem to have that ability.
Secondly, there's a correlation between certain types of personalities being naturally attracted to the narcissism that Trump offers. This is an even deeper issue because narcissists and their enablers rarely see their own wrong doing. They are attracted to Trump for a reason and they all have similarities that are pretty common in narcissists and their non narcissistic enabling counterparts. Enablers often are drawn to these sorts of people and I don't think it's no coincidence that nearly all of die hard maga that have been that way for many years all share the same lack of empathy and all share the same enabling behaviors.
A gaslighter is always going to gaslight no matter what. If the left did not exist, these people would still be the same.
This means that these maga people for the more die hard people are bound to always end up with the same fate.
I feel like people place an unfair responsibility on the left to make sure that everyone else's feelings are in check constantly. Do we have to be unnecessarily mean? No I don't think the left should be that but I do notice how we can't talk about racism without people trying to place responsibility on the left for everyone else's feelings on the matter. I don't have to be mean but I kinda feel like how people take things isn't my responsibility as I can't force a person to not be that way regardless.
I just feel like it's an unfair responsibility to task the left with saving every thin skinned person out there.
