Politics & News

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Obama Awarded Nobel Prize For Exemplary Work Planning Russian Collusion Hoax

Former U.S. President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday for his efforts in fabricating national intelligence to promote the Russian Collusion Hoax and undermine the presidency of Donald Trump.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee voted unanimously to award the prize to Obama, citing his obsession with destroying Donald Trump as a key factor.

"We admire Barack Obama's commitment to corruption and suppressing the will of the American people who duly elected Donald Trump as their president," said Nobel Committee member Jan Erik Hansen. "He may not have succeeded, but we like his moxy."

This marks the second time Obama has won a peace prize. He previously won in 2009 for his potential to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples, though he had never gotten around to doing so.

"Accepting this prize is not an admission of guilt," Obama said as he graciously accepted the prize along with a monetary award of 10 million Swedish kronor.

The prize may go down in history as among the most controversial, but committee members say critics shouldn't be so surprised they'd award a Nobel Peace Prize to a corrupt two-faced politician. "It's the same reason we gave the Peace Prize to Yasser Arafat," said committee member Bjorn Walkruf.

At publishing time, Barack Obama traveled to Cuba for what he claimed was a vacation to celebrate his Nobel Prize victory, and not to avoid extradition to the United States for crimes of treason.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ElwoodBlues · M

Funny thing: The Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation has already concluded that "Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf." Who headed that committee?? Oh, right, Marco Rubio🤣😂

Sorry, but tRump will need to find another way to distract from Epstein. Maybe starting a war with Iran??

[Aug 2020] WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election

The full report: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/2020/08/18/press-rubio-statement-senate-intel-release-volume-5-bipartisan-russia-report/

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 On March 6, 2009, a "reset" policy was proposed by our new at the time Secretary of State. Eight years later, Putin was terrified of her. What's your point??

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 You identified a policy from March 2009; yet you can't explain what your point about it is???

Here, lemme help you out. Your point is to try to distract from tRump's pedophilia.

Thinkerbell · 41-45, F

@ElwoodBlues @sunsporter1649

At publishing time,the well-known SW Democrat partisan Elwood Blues did his level best to resurrect the Russia-collusion hoax by resorting (as usual) to not telling the whole story. "Even Marco Rubio admits there were Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election," said Blues, but characteristically omitted to mention that Rubio also said there was no evidence of collusion between Trump or his campaign with the Russians.

In an exclusive interview at publishing time, Marco Rubio provided the following statements:

[media=https://youtu.be/eozQ8KB3SVk]

When approached for comment on Blues' and Rubio's statements, Robert Mueller said, "I take your question," before quickly retiring to his apartment and slamming the door.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@Thinkerbell deadwood is enjoying his favorite drink

ElwoodBlues · M

@Thinkerbell It's true, I didn't quote the entire report; I merely linked to it.

And my point remains accurate. There was no "Russia hoax." Instead, the truth is that "Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf."

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 My point remains accurate. There was no "Russia hoax." Instead, the truth is that "Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf."

And let's not forget this part of the report:

... as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

Thinkerbell · 41-45, F

@ElwoodBlues

"And my point remains accurate. There was no "Russia hoax." "

You're fudging again, Ellie. I said "Russia-collusion hoax," and there indeed was one, pushed hard by the Democrats, but on which Mueller couldn't come up with the goods, despite a two-year effort by his dedicated staff of 19 lawyers, 17 of whom were Democrat partisan contributors.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Thinkerbell Let's not forget this part of the report:

... as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

Regular contact between campaign associates and Russians with the expectation of benefit to the campaign. Not "collusion" at all!! RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues The same thing every incoming administration does, holding meetings with every country, to insure smooth transition

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 You're fudging again, sunstroke🤣😂
DOZENS of the contacts between the tRump campaign and Russian agents happened BEFORE THE RNC!!!

Papadopoulos, Trump Jr., Scavino, Manafort and others ALL had repeated meetings with Russian agents both before and after the RNC. tRump wasn't even a nominee at that time, much less an "incoming administration"🤣😂

Source: Mueller report, graphically formatted in
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/26/us/politics/trump-contacts-russians-wikileaks.html

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues And of course, the contenders never had their acolytes out speaking to anyone about anything, just went to the convention uninformed, right?

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 Look up the Logan Act (18 U.S.C. § 953)

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues LOL, and just what disputes was Gen. Flynn negotiating with the ruskies? The import tax on vodka?

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 You mean retired Gen. Mike Flynn who - while working for tRump - received $530,000 to represent Turkish interests, and later pleaded guilty to a felony for "willfully and knowingly making materially false statements and omissions to the Federal Bureau of Investigation" about conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, "in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2)," or are you referring to some other Mike Flynn???

Quotes from United States v. Flynn, 411 F.Supp. 3d. 15, 21 (D.D.C 2019).

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues And what else did the tooth fairy tell you?

Thinkerbell · 41-45, F

@ElwoodBlues

"Look up the Logan Act (18 U.S.C. § 953)"

You're floundering again, Ellie. 🤭
Only two people have ever been indicted under the Logan act (both in the 1800s), and none has ever been convicted.

In flounders' fields El's flatus blows,
How much, how often, no one knows,
And up above, high in the sky,
The birds grow dizzy by and by,
And folks below? Each holds his nose.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Thinkerbell Most sensible candidates have no trouble obeying the Logan Act. And they gave Flynn a comfy plea-bargain of only 1 felony.

Mike Flynn who - while working for tRump - received $530,000 to represent Turkish interests, and later pleaded guilty to a felony for "willfully and knowingly making materially false statements and omissions to the Federal Bureau of Investigation" about conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, "in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2)."

But c'mon, wouldn't you rather talk about the latest tRump-Epstein news???