So Trump is now going to get his way and end birthright citizenship due to a 'stacked' Supreme court

Does that therefore mean that existing US citizens and permanent residents who are pregnant and for whatever reason happen to give birth outside the bounds of mainland USA, Alaska, or any other US-claimed territory, that the baby will be by default denied US citizenship despite the parents being US citizens or perm residents?

North American Korea is amping up.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

This round was a test to see if the court could be relied on to toe the line for Project 2025. Wait for the real fun to start soon.. Some nice mid term altering goodies..😷

FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays · M

@whowasthatmaskedman Liberals used to scream about a single judge overruling Obama's policies for the whole country. You don't get it. This court ruling cuts both ways, against Democratic Presidents and Republican Presidents.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays I do get that. And frankly, the idea of a single President running the nation is a little archaic in the days of instant global communication. The leader of the House is in a much better position to know the state of the nation and the government. But skipping over that, this subdivides the nation and sends to back to interstate bickering, in my view quite deliberately. The international money can now pick off states individually by threatening local conditions.. America the nation is toast.. But it was nice while it lasted.. To be crystal clear, this isnt about right or left. This is about rich V the rest.. And the rich have already won .😷

FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays · M

@whowasthatmaskedman The rich have always run the show. Who do you think wrote the U.S. Constitution in the first place? The Constitution was written by the rich, for the rich.

The majority of the 55 delegates at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 were wealthy landowners, slaveholders, lawyers, merchants, or creditors. Many had personal economic interests that were directly affected by national policy. For example:

George Washington was one of the wealthiest men in America.

James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were slave-owning planters.

Alexander Hamilton was deeply tied to banking and commercial interests.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays Yes. Specifically Male proprty owners were allowed to vote..The difference is that it was always done behind closed doors in secret, skirting around the actual law.. But, largely thanks to Trump, its all out in public and needs to be officially made the law of the land or people will be thrown in jail (like Trump) for perverting the law and governmment for all these years..😷